2005
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i35.5485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and morphological changes of the gut barrier during the restitution process after hemorrhagic shock

Abstract: The gut barrier of the rats was seriously damaged at the early phase of ischemic reperfusion injury after hemorrhagic shock, which included the injury and atrophy in intestinal mucosa and the increasing of intestinal permeability. Simultaneously, the intestinal mucosa also showed its great repairing potentiality, such as the improvement of the intestinal permeability and the recovery of the morphology at different phases after ischemic reperfusion injury. The restitution of gut barrier function was obviously s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
58
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
58
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The liberation of proteolytic enzymes, particularly cathepsina D, was higher than the proximal portions of the small intestine. These findings suggest a greater susceptibility of structural compromise of the small intestine in relations to the colon, as has been observed by other authors 13,14,8 . This way, colic anastomoses carried out under adverse conditions could be more resistant, becoming in just a few alterations into biomechanic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The liberation of proteolytic enzymes, particularly cathepsina D, was higher than the proximal portions of the small intestine. These findings suggest a greater susceptibility of structural compromise of the small intestine in relations to the colon, as has been observed by other authors 13,14,8 . This way, colic anastomoses carried out under adverse conditions could be more resistant, becoming in just a few alterations into biomechanic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Therefore, the simultaneous occurrence of intestinal injuries in patients in critical condition, make it relevant and the anastomotic dehiscence contributes to the death rate. Besides this, the intestinal tract is one of the organs that precociously suffers the consequences of the mechanism of post-shock hemorrhagic ischemia 8 , causing the release of inflammatory cytokines, toxins and bacterial translocation with serious systemic repercussions and, it is believed, that these alterations can negatively influence intestinal anastomoses. 3 Considering ethical and practical aspects in the evaluation of this variable, the influence of the state of hemorrhagic shock in patients with intestinal anastomoses, a study model in animals has been elaborated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPS introduced into the intraperitoneal cavity enters the systemic circulation via the portal vein and activates the immune system [5], which was confirmed by monitoring serum TNFa in our study. This mimics the clinical situation in cases of severe trauma when the gut barrier is impaired and gram negative bacteria containing LPS enter the blood stream [11,41]. Second, we focused mainly on the cells that have been shown to play an important role in the inflammatory, regenerative, and remodeling phases (1-6 weeks postoperative) of the repair process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I/R has also been shown to induce apoptosis [20] . Bacterial translocation and mucosal barrier dysfunction have been implicated in the damage caused by I/R in the gut [21] . This damage is also related to an increase in circulating levels of proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), liberated by the intestine itself [22] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%