1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1058-2746(99)90136-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after single-tendon rotator cuff reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
84
1
17

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
84
1
17
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, the prevalence of rerupture among all supraspinatus tendon tears was 46% for the entire series but only 26.9% among small-to-intermediate supraspinatus tendon tears. This is in agreement with reported rerupture prevalences in similar MR-based investigations [18,23]. Intraoperatively torn tendons e Three infraspinatus tendon tears are excluded in this section * Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcome **Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between non-massive and massive tears ***Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between SS tear and SS/IS tear ****Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between SS tear and SB/SS/IS tear The number of torn tendons is said to influence the rerupture prevalence [3,9,10,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our study, the prevalence of rerupture among all supraspinatus tendon tears was 46% for the entire series but only 26.9% among small-to-intermediate supraspinatus tendon tears. This is in agreement with reported rerupture prevalences in similar MR-based investigations [18,23]. Intraoperatively torn tendons e Three infraspinatus tendon tears are excluded in this section * Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcome **Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between non-massive and massive tears ***Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between SS tear and SS/IS tear ****Statistical difference of rerupture prevalence between SS tear and SB/SS/IS tear The number of torn tendons is said to influence the rerupture prevalence [3,9,10,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Tendon rerupture has attracted preferential attention and has been extensively assessed by means of arthrography [2][3][4][5], ultrasound [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], arthrography combined with computed tomography (CT) [16][17][18], magnetic resonance (MR) imaging [13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], and MR arthrography [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, if rotator cuff repair was performed, not the normal but the abnormal MR appearance of tendons is the expected finding. Even reduced tendon thickness and partial or full-thickness tendon "tears" can be observed as a "normal" finding in asymptomatic patients, who have undergone rotator cuff surgery with a favorable functional outcome [6,50,51]. In the study by Zanetti and coworkers, full-thickness defects were, however, significantly smaller in asymptomatic patients (<11 mm) than in symptomatic patients [6].…”
Section: Postoperative Imaging Findingsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…많은 저자들이 개방적 혹은 관절경적 회전근 개의 봉 합술후 발생하는 재파열에 대해 보고하였다 1,6-8, 12,[14][15][16]20,22,25,30) . 저자들마다 회전근개 재파열의 발생 빈도는 수술전 파열크기에 따라서 13%에서 1) 94%까지 6) 다양 하게 보고하였으며 각기 다른 영상기기를 이용하여 재 파열을 확인하고 회전근개의 연속성(integrity) 여부와 임상적 결과에 대하여 보고하였다 7,8,12,14,15,20,30) .…”
Section: 서 론unclassified