2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.07.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional and effective connectivity in subthalamic local field potential recordings of patients with Parkinson’s disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beta-band functional connectivity observed within the STN tallies well-with earlier work, indicating that this synchronization reflects a pathological marker for different motor features of PD (Pogosyan et al, 2010; Hohlefeld et al, 2013). We also located the most prominent phase synchronization in the dorsal, sensorimotor part of the STN (Pogosyan et al, 2010), i.e., the area known to be clinically most effective in suppressing PD symptoms during DBS (Herzog et al, 2004; Yokoyama et al, 2006; Schlaier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The beta-band functional connectivity observed within the STN tallies well-with earlier work, indicating that this synchronization reflects a pathological marker for different motor features of PD (Pogosyan et al, 2010; Hohlefeld et al, 2013). We also located the most prominent phase synchronization in the dorsal, sensorimotor part of the STN (Pogosyan et al, 2010), i.e., the area known to be clinically most effective in suppressing PD symptoms during DBS (Herzog et al, 2004; Yokoyama et al, 2006; Schlaier et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Thereby, it is more sensitive to detect true phase interaction as compared to common phase measurements such as the imaginary part of coherence (Nolte et al, 2004). The value of WPLI was standardized by an estimate of its standard deviation and values beyond threshold of 3 (corresponding p < 0.003) were considered statistically significant (Nolte et al, 2004; Hohlefeld et al, 2013, 2014). This statistically significant frequency range (see Figure 2B) was used for further analysis, i.e., phase extraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, we also performed a robust averaging (Litvak et al, 2012). Finally, we computed the absolute value of the coherency (i.e., the coherence Coh) and the imaginary part of the coherency (iCoh) to isolate the part of coherency possibly affected by volume conduction (Nolte et al, 2004, 2008; Hohlefeld et al, 2013). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This application of functional connectivity analysis is commonly found in electrophysiological experiments in nonhuman species, where direct recordings of individual cells or multiunit activity may be correlated among different recording sites (Aertsen, Erb, & Palm, 1994;Gerstein & Perkel, 1969). In humans, it may also be applied to direct recordings during deep brain stimulation by correlating electrophysiological recordings from the implanted electrodes between different sites or contacts or by correlating them with cortical signals as measured, for example, by magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) (e.g., Hohlefeld et al, 2013;Lourens et al, 2013). Another non-fMRI application of functional connectivity analyses is the delineation of correlations or more precisely coherence between EEG sensors, which due to the high temporal resolution of EEG may be computed as broadband correlations or specific for particular frequency bands.…”
Section: Functional Connectivity: Definition and Conceptual Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%