2000
DOI: 10.1542/peds.106.6.1387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fulminant Late-Onset Sepsis in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, 1988–1997, and the Impact of Avoiding Empiric Vancomycin Therapy

Abstract: These data suggest that empiric antibiotics selected for treatment of suspected sepsis in infants >3 days old need to effectively treat Gram-negative pathogens, particularly Pseudomonas sp., because these organisms, although less frequent, are strongly associated with fulminant late-onset sepsis in the NICU. Avoiding empiric vancomycin therapy seemed to be a reasonable approach to late-onset sepsis, because of the very low frequency of fulminant sepsis caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
145
2
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
14
145
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown previously that a single-site blood culture should be sufficient to document sepsis in symptomatic infants, and is biologically plausible because young infants have high-colony-count bacteremia, the bacterial clearance is slower and the bacteremia more continuous in newborns with sepsis than in older patients. 16 The distribution of pathogens causing sepsis in a specific hospital unit is usually considered when empiric antibiotics are selected, but 'this approach assumes that all pathogens causing sepsis have equal likelihood of causing severe complications including meningitis and death,' 17,18 and that all antibiotics will have good cerebrospinal fluid penetration and be equally effective to treat meningitis, which is commonly associated with Gram-negative sepsis. In reality, when empiric antibiotics for late-onset sepsis are selected, one should be especially concerned about fulminant late-onset Gram-negative sepsis, in which infants die before pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities have been identified, often in <48 h of onset of illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have shown previously that a single-site blood culture should be sufficient to document sepsis in symptomatic infants, and is biologically plausible because young infants have high-colony-count bacteremia, the bacterial clearance is slower and the bacteremia more continuous in newborns with sepsis than in older patients. 16 The distribution of pathogens causing sepsis in a specific hospital unit is usually considered when empiric antibiotics are selected, but 'this approach assumes that all pathogens causing sepsis have equal likelihood of causing severe complications including meningitis and death,' 17,18 and that all antibiotics will have good cerebrospinal fluid penetration and be equally effective to treat meningitis, which is commonly associated with Gram-negative sepsis. In reality, when empiric antibiotics for late-onset sepsis are selected, one should be especially concerned about fulminant late-onset Gram-negative sepsis, in which infants die before pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities have been identified, often in <48 h of onset of illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, when empiric antibiotics for late-onset sepsis are selected, one should be especially concerned about fulminant late-onset Gram-negative sepsis, in which infants die before pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities have been identified, often in <48 h of onset of illness. 18 With changing patterns of organisms (e.g., coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Candida) causing most of the late-onset sepsis cases in NICUs, neutropenia in VLBW infants will more likely result from other causes such as benign late-onset neutropenia, as described by Omar et al 19 rather than sepsis. While the isolated finding of neutropenia in a stable preterm infant may not warrant a sepsis evaluation or aggressive management, neutropenia in a sick infant may be ominous and may serve as an early warning for Gram-negative bacterial sepsis unless proven otherwise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Completed part 2 surveys were received from 278 clinicians, including 277 attending neonatologists or fellows-72% of eligible clinicians at the 35 hospitals. There was a median of 6 respondents per NICU (range: [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Thirteen NICUs (38%) also participated in the Vermont Oxford Neonatal Network, and 9 (26%) participated in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system high-risk nursery component.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Participating Nicusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the bacteria eliminated were Gram-negative bacilli known to be associated with serious nosocomial infections in the NICU. 28 eUVGI was associated with a reduction in colonization of patient airways and VAP. These results suggest that it is possible that airborne pathogens may contribute significantly to surface contamination and patient colonization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%