Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical Trial

Abstract

This study assessed the clinical variables influencing the success of three-unit implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (ISFDPs) fabricated using either fully digital or conventional workflows. The clinical trial evaluated 10 patients requiring three-unit ISFDPs in the posterior mandible. Maxillomandibular relation records, and digital and conventional impressions were obtained from each patient using an intraoral scanner (IoS) and polyvinylsiloxane (PVS), and the frameworks were fabricated using zirconia and cobalt–chromium, respectively. A 2 µm accuracy scanner scanned the conventional master casts and standard reference models. The stereolithography (STL) files of the digital and conventional impressions were superimposed on the standard model file, and the accuracy was calculated with the best-fit algorithm. The framework adaptation and passivity were assessed using the one-screw and screw resistance tests. The time required for occlusal adjustment of both types of reconstructions, including the duration of the whole treatment, was recorded. The aesthetic appearance of ISFDPs was rated by each patient and clinician using a self-administered visual analogue scale questionnaire and the FDI World Dental Federation aesthetic parameters, respectively. The sample size was based on the power calculation, and alpha was set at 0.05 for the statistical analyses. The impression accuracy, framework adaptation and passivity, and reconstructions aesthetics did not significantly differ between the digital and conventional approaches. The total fabrication time was significantly shorter using the digital workflow. Within the limitations of this clinical study, the fully digital workflow can be used for the fabrication of ISFDPs with a clinical outcome comparable to that of the conventional workflow.

Minimally Invasive Laminate Veneer Therapy for Maxillary Central Incisors

“…Finally, it is essential to note that the success of any dental treatment depends not only on the technical aspects but also on the patient’s satisfaction [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ]. Therefore, thoroughly discussing the patient’s expectations and desires before initiating any treatment is crucial to ensure the desired outcome [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. In this case, the patient was highly satisfied with the final outcome and reported a significant improvement in her self-confidence and overall satisfaction with her smile.…”

Innovations in mandibular advancement splint therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea

“…Benefits in patient preference, time savings and elimination of physical storage make digital workflows superior to conventional dental workflows (Mangano et al, 2017). Accuracy of both intraoral scanners and conventional impression methods are also comparable (Afrashtehfar et al, 2022;Hashemi et al, 2022). Device fabrication via CAD/CAM methods allows for the time efficient production of dental devices (van Noort, 2012).…”

Effect of incisal preparation design on the fracture strength of monolithic zirconia‐reinforced lithium silicate laminate veneers

“…Chairside computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) permits clinicians to precisely manufacture a wide array of materials, for provisional or definitive restorations, faster than the traditional methods. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Recent studies have demonstrated that CAD-CAM restorations have a better marginal adaptation than conventionally fabricated indirect restorations. 8,9 Similar to CAD-CAM complete cov-erage restorations, laminate veneers (LVs) can be fabricated using CAD-CAM technology where an intraoral scanner (IOS) is used to register the preparation, designed, and then milled from a material of choice.…”