2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fully automated image quality evaluation on patient CT: Multi-vendor and multi-reconstruction study

Abstract: While the recent advancements of computed tomography (CT) technology have contributed in reducing radiation dose and image noise, an objective evaluation of image quality in patient scans has not yet been established. In this study, we present a patient-specific CT image quality evaluation method that includes fully automated measurements of noise level, structure sharpness, and alteration of structure. This study used the CT images of 120 patients from four different CT scanners reconstructed with three types… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Chun et al [44] presented a novel image quality evaluation method that allows a fully automated assessment of three image quality metrics (noise level, structure sharpness, and alteration of structure) on patient CT images. They applied this method to the contrast-enhanced liver CT images from four different CT scanners reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), vendor-specific iterative reconstruction (IR), and a vendoragnostic deep learning model (DLM).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Chun et al [44] presented a novel image quality evaluation method that allows a fully automated assessment of three image quality metrics (noise level, structure sharpness, and alteration of structure) on patient CT images. They applied this method to the contrast-enhanced liver CT images from four different CT scanners reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP), vendor-specific iterative reconstruction (IR), and a vendoragnostic deep learning model (DLM).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with every single patient audit procedure, as the overscan occurred in internal and external datasets at a frequency of 22.4% and 32%, it was estimated that the developed algorithm could reduce the workload of overscan range check by 68% and 77.6% for each dataset. We also expect that combinations of our algorithm with radiation dose and image quality monitoring could establish the fully automated and integrated CT quality system for every patient [ 53 57 ]. By reducing human and time resources with full automation, it is available to equip high throughput and objective quality monitoring platform for the entire CT scans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since the implementation of more complex and iterative image reconstruction algorithms, the use of traditional image quality metrics such as SNR and CNR for objective image assessment in PCCT remains limited due to the nonlinearity of iterative reconstruction methods [48]. This is also present for different model-based and deep learning reconstructions [49] offered by manufacturers. Further development of new, robust methods will be necessary in the future.…”
Section: Data Storage and Postprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%