2004
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full scale fluidized bed anaerobic reactor for domestic wastewater treatment: performance, sludge production and biofilm

Abstract: This paper describes the performance, sludge production and biofilm characteristics of a full scale fluidized bed anaerobic reactor (32 m3) for domestic wastewater treatment. The reactor was operated with 10.5 m x h(-1) upflow velocity, 3.2 h hydraulic retention time, and recirculation ratio of 0.85 and it presented removal efficiencies of 71+/-8% of COD and 77+/-14% of TSS. During the apparent steady-state period, specific sludge production and sludge age in the reactor were (0.116+/-0.033) kgVSS. kgCOD(-1) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the treatment process finished, a small amount of sludge was generated (5.8×10 -5 kg×kg COD -1 ) compared with the conventional anaerobic process (0.611±0.33 kg×kg COD -1 ). 28 This sludge was the Fe(OH) 3 occurring during the process. The cost of this treatment process was not estimated because this work was carried out as a batch-mode reaction at a bench-scale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the treatment process finished, a small amount of sludge was generated (5.8×10 -5 kg×kg COD -1 ) compared with the conventional anaerobic process (0.611±0.33 kg×kg COD -1 ). 28 This sludge was the Fe(OH) 3 occurring during the process. The cost of this treatment process was not estimated because this work was carried out as a batch-mode reaction at a bench-scale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that the biomass grew mainly in granules and partly in a biofilm under the conditions of long HRT and low upward liquid velocity. The anaerobic sludge age in the reactor was about 28 ± 2 days, which was larger than the values reported previously (Mendonca et al 2004). However, the long sludge retention time (SRT) was beneficial to the stability of the anaerobic treatment system.…”
Section: Anaerobic Biofilm and Granular Sludgementioning
confidence: 54%
“…Fluidized-bed biofilm reactors (FBBR) have already been used widely for wastewater treatment [1,2,3]. Compared with activated sludge reactors and packed bed biofilm reactors, FBBR has many advantages such as high biomass concentration, no wash-out limitation on the liquid flow rate, no bed clogging, low external mass transfer resistance, and easy control of biofilm thickness with little disturbance to continuous operation [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%