2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2019.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Full scale CFD seakeeping simulations for case study ship redesigned from V-shaped bulbous bow to X-bow hull form

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing the remaining two variants, AxeL and X, we can conclude that differences between the results obtained for them are minimal, which results from certain limitations of the strip method, in which the hull shape is simplified and only represented by a set of frame sections. Only the use of more complex numerical methods, CFD for instance, provides opportunities for analysing the effect of bow shape changes [21]. What is more, the variant AxeL is an aberration of the Enlarged Ship Concept (ESC), as it changes the bow form by changing shapes of its frame sections, without extending the entire hull body to preserve mass parameters.…”
Section: Results For Head Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing the remaining two variants, AxeL and X, we can conclude that differences between the results obtained for them are minimal, which results from certain limitations of the strip method, in which the hull shape is simplified and only represented by a set of frame sections. Only the use of more complex numerical methods, CFD for instance, provides opportunities for analysing the effect of bow shape changes [21]. What is more, the variant AxeL is an aberration of the Enlarged Ship Concept (ESC), as it changes the bow form by changing shapes of its frame sections, without extending the entire hull body to preserve mass parameters.…”
Section: Results For Head Wavementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This design is intended to decrease the added resistance of the hull and to reduce dynamic pressures generated by wave breaking. However, in both the AXE-bow and X-bow designs, the decreased displacement of the bow section leads to the increase of pitching and heaving amplitudes, with the resulting amplitude increase of vertical accelerations [16], [21]. The inverted bow concept was also analysed in [22] for frigate FFG-7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caramatescu and Mocanu, [17], study on the wave impact stress on the composite hull. Niklas and Pruszko, [18], conducted the CFD seakeeping simulations of the modifications of V-shaped Bulbous Bow to X-Bow hull form. Tavakoli et al, [19], study on the dynamic of the planing hull in regular waves by comparing the experimental measurement and numerical methods.…”
Section: The Literature Review On the Development Of The Monohull Fast Boat Hull Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, research on Savonius turbine development is about modifying the number of blades and Shape of blade which is carried out either in simulation or experiment [10]. Collaboration of the mentioned methods is very effective as results of experimental works can be expanded by numerical approach, and vice versa, which this research stage is taken as benchmarking in computational fluid dynamic [11][12][13][14][15] and finite element method [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%