2015
DOI: 10.2514/atcq.23.1.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fuel and Energy Benchmark Analysis of Continuous Descent Operations

Abstract: In this paper the existing CDO procedures at three relevant German airports are analyzed with respect to both the achievable (maximum specific range) and the effectively achieved fuel savings in comparison to conventionally flown arrivals. To do so, we applied our highly precise flight performance model EJPM [1] to several thousand flown trajectories before and after CDO implementation, the data of which was provided to us as radar track data. A technique was developed to estimate the individual aircraft gross… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Larger aircraft during low traffic scenarios in specific airports seem to show the biggest potential benefits. This is also supported by the findings of Fricke et al 6 where the effects of level-off segments at different altitudes were directly related to additional fuel burn increasing with the length of the level-off and with the altitude where the level-off takes place (the lower the altitude the greater the additional fuel burn). The relationship between the additional fuel burn and the altitude was found not to be linear, demonstrating that removing level-offs at lower altitude allows for the biggest fuel savings.…”
Section: Continuous Descent Operationssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Larger aircraft during low traffic scenarios in specific airports seem to show the biggest potential benefits. This is also supported by the findings of Fricke et al 6 where the effects of level-off segments at different altitudes were directly related to additional fuel burn increasing with the length of the level-off and with the altitude where the level-off takes place (the lower the altitude the greater the additional fuel burn). The relationship between the additional fuel burn and the altitude was found not to be linear, demonstrating that removing level-offs at lower altitude allows for the biggest fuel savings.…”
Section: Continuous Descent Operationssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The study of Thipphavong et al (2012) implemented an adaptive aircraft weight algorithm to improve the accuracy of climbing predictions. Fricke et al (2015) illustrated the significant influence of aircraft mass on fuel burn during continuous descent operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) has published some CDO guidance material [4] to support air navigation service providers (ANSP) to design vertical corridors in which all descent trajectories must be contained, helping in this way to strategically separate them from other procedures in the vicinity. However, as reported in [5], these criteria have been established without explicitly considering the aircraft type, assuming international standard atmosphere (ISA) conditions and with coarse assumptions regarding the aircraft gross mass and performance data. This leads, in the majority of cases, to too restrictive corridors that limit the potential CDO adherence in real operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%