2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/dsaa.2019.00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FSSD - A Fast and Efficient Algorithm for Subgroup Set Discovery

Abstract: Subgroup discovery (SD) is the task of discovering interpretable patterns in the data that stand out w.r.t. some property of interest. Discovering patterns that accurately discriminate a class from the others is one of the most common SD tasks. Standard approaches of the literature are based on local pattern discovery, which is known to provide an overwhelmingly large number of redundant patterns. To solve this issue, pattern set mining has been proposed: instead of evaluating the quality of patterns separatel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, although we consider a rich pattern language in comparison to other approaches, we can exploit the syntactic tree structure of the queries, to mine tree patterns, more expressive than conjunctions of SQL clauses. Third, an effort is needed to produce more qualitative subgroup sets with more diversity (data cover) and less redundancy [44], and directly considering a quality measure on the subgroup set, turning the top-k mining problem into subgroup set mining [45]. Finally, subjectivness and practitioner preferences should be considered by the mining algorithms through an interactive discovery process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, although we consider a rich pattern language in comparison to other approaches, we can exploit the syntactic tree structure of the queries, to mine tree patterns, more expressive than conjunctions of SQL clauses. Third, an effort is needed to produce more qualitative subgroup sets with more diversity (data cover) and less redundancy [44], and directly considering a quality measure on the subgroup set, turning the top-k mining problem into subgroup set mining [45]. Finally, subjectivness and practitioner preferences should be considered by the mining algorithms through an interactive discovery process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that Problem the non-redundant subgroup set discovery problem is equivalent to the discovery of closed on the positive patterns (COTP): [12] addresses the general case while [7], [11] consider the discovery of closed on the positive interval patterns within numerical data. The key idea is that any sub-interval of a COTP will drop at least one positive object, thus, reducing the true positive rate, hence many measures such as the W RAcc.…”
Section: Closed On the Positive Interval Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e training results of this algorithm are compared with the traditional SSD, RFBNet (Receptive Field Block Net) [33], FSSD (Feature Fusion Single-Shot Multibox Detector) [34], RefineDet (Single-Shot Refinement Neural Network for Object Detection) [35], and M2Det (Multilevel and Multiscale Detector) [36] algorithm, where the x-axis represents the period (epoch) and the y-axis represents the training loss. In the early stage of training, the RefineDet uses the Refi-ne_multibox_loss, which is the second operation of the multibox_loss, so the convergence speed is slow; the other 5 curves use the multibox_loss as the loss function, and their convergence speeds are very fast.…”
Section: Rationality Analysis Of Feature Cross-level Fusionmentioning
confidence: 99%