2012
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0000282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FRP-Masonry Debonding: Numerical and Experimental Study of the Role of Mortar Joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) that governs the bond-slip and consequently the energy of fracture. It was noted that even a consistent changing of the law and considerably reducing of the fracture energy, the curve force-elongation does not vary significantly [48], it was decided to eliminate the mortar-fiber interface. To this purpose, the same interface law previously calibrated according to scenario 1 was also used here but it was only applied to bricks, irrespective of their positions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) that governs the bond-slip and consequently the energy of fracture. It was noted that even a consistent changing of the law and considerably reducing of the fracture energy, the curve force-elongation does not vary significantly [48], it was decided to eliminate the mortar-fiber interface. To this purpose, the same interface law previously calibrated according to scenario 1 was also used here but it was only applied to bricks, irrespective of their positions (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, experimental curves obtained from masonry prisms presented several discontinuities or jumps during the debonding part of the tests, with a typical saw-tooth shaped curve, where load drops are associated with the periodic alternation of bricks and mortar joints on the substrate [10,27,[44][45][46]. This particular behavior was mainly observed analyzing load-slip curves and confirmed by local strain gauges readings during tests execution; several numerical models [39,44,[47][48][49] were then developed in order to validate experimental outcomes and to better understand this phenomenon, assuming different interface laws for bricks and mortar joints.…”
Section: Global Results: Force-slip Curves 23mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Tests are carried out mainly under displacement control. Displacement transducers (LVDTs or potentiometers) have been used for monitoring the slip between the reinforcement and the substrate during the test, whereas strain gauges or innovative techniques (such as Digital Image Correlation [28,33,37,39,41,42]) allowed to analyze local strain distributions during the debonding process. Results of bond tests have been analyzed and discussed in terms of load-slip curves, strain distributions, and, when possible, interface laws experimentally determined.…”
Section: Set-up 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14(a and b). It can be seen that the bonded area consists of three main regions as also discussed in [10,30]. The FRP is fully debonded from the substrate near the loaded end.…”
Section: Strain Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Several researchers have focused during the last years on experimental, numerical and analytical modeling of the bond behavior in FRP-strengthened masonry, see e.g. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The experimental tests have been conducted on different substrates (including stone, brick or masonry prism) strengthened with various FRP composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%