2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.01.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical and experimental study of GFRP-masonry interface behavior: Bond evolution and role of the mortar layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14b) and the strain field (Fig. 14b) on brickwork clearly show that the inhomogeneity of the substrate induces a strongly uneven strain distribution, with a periodic variation related to the alternation of brick units and mortar joints [41,42]. Stress transfer is concentrated at the brick surface, while it strongly reduces at the bed joints, due to the lower stiffness of the mortar with respect to the brick.…”
Section: Masonry Substratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…14b) and the strain field (Fig. 14b) on brickwork clearly show that the inhomogeneity of the substrate induces a strongly uneven strain distribution, with a periodic variation related to the alternation of brick units and mortar joints [41,42]. Stress transfer is concentrated at the brick surface, while it strongly reduces at the bed joints, due to the lower stiffness of the mortar with respect to the brick.…”
Section: Masonry Substratesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Detailed knowledge of the interface behaviour allows to perform an accurate numerical analysis, where between the FRP reinforcement and the masonry substrate can be placed a cluster of zeroethickness interface elements [40,41] characterized by the analytical laws calibrated as described.…”
Section: Local Interface Lawsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, when load-slip curves coming from bond tests on bricks and on masonry prisms are compared, a significant difference can be found between these two types of substrates. In fact, experimental curves obtained from masonry prisms presented several discontinuities or jumps during the debonding part of the tests, with a typical saw-tooth shaped curve, where load drops are associated with the periodic alternation of bricks and mortar joints on the substrate [10,27,[44][45][46]. This particular behavior was mainly observed analyzing load-slip curves and confirmed by local strain gauges readings during tests execution; several numerical models [39,44,[47][48][49] were then developed in order to validate experimental outcomes and to better understand this phenomenon, assuming different interface laws for bricks and mortar joints.…”
Section: Global Results: Force-slip Curves 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of interface laws calibrations can be found in different studies [9, 13-16, 19, 23-25, 27, 41, 55] and have been very useful as a first step to define parameters for performing accurate numerical analyses [44,[56][57][58][59], even at larger scales. Fig.…”
Section: Local Interface Laws 25mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation