Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study

Goedert, Kelly M.; Chen, Peii; Foundas, Anne L.; Barrett, Anna M.

doi:10.1080/09602011.2018.1448287

Cited by 43 publications

(33 citation statements)

References 80 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This model of neglect recovery predicts that only patients with preserved dorsal attentional system and preserved posterior callosal pathway will benefit from the shift in hemispheric dominance and hence respond to the treatment. This prediction has been validated in three independent studies 21–23…”

Section: Impact Of Cognitive Models On Stroke Rehabilitationmentioning

confidence: 83%

Identifying patterns of cognitive deficits: the path to better outcomes after stroke

Clarke

2020

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Impact Of Cognitive Models On Stroke Rehabilitationmentioning

confidence: 83%

Identifying patterns of cognitive deficits: the path to better outcomes after stroke

Clarke

2020

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The profound limb-specific or direction-specific motor abnormalities that occur in spatial neglect have been discovered to be associated with a better response to prism adaptation treatment [35,44,69]. Patients who responded well in these studies had large strokes and frontal lobe lesions [45,70] and are likely to come to medical attention. However, because their symptoms are not visual or perceptual, how will we identify these patients?…”

Section: Neurobiology Of Spatial Neglect: Combined Motor and Spatial Brain Functionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Update on the Clinical Approach to Spatial Neglect

Barrett

Houston

2019

Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose of Review-Spatial neglect is asymmetric orienting and action after a brain lesion, causing functional disability. It is common after a stroke; however, it is vastly underdocumented and undertreated. This article addresses the implementation gap in identifying and treating spatial neglect, to reduce disability and improve healthcare costs and burden.Recent Findings-Professional organizations published recommendations to implement spatial neglect care. Physicians can lead an interdisciplinary team: functionally relevant spatial neglect assessment, evidence-based spatial retraining, and integrated spatial and vision interventions can optimize outcomes. Research also strongly suggests spatial neglect adversely affects motor systems. Spatial neglect therapy might thus "kick-start" rehabilitation and improve paralysis recovery.Summary-Clinicians can implement new techniques to detect spatial neglect and lead interdisciplinary teams to promote better, integrated spatial neglect care. Future studies of brain imaging biomarkers to detect spatial neglect, and real-world applicability of prism adaptation treatment, are needed.

show abstract

“…Table 1 outlines a few examples of each treatment component category from selected common rehabilitation treatments. 20–30 …”

Section: The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis

Stan

Dijkers

Whyte

et al. 2019

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

119

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite significant advances in measuring the outcomes of rehabilitation interventions, little progress has been made in specifying the therapeutic ingredients and processes that cause the measured changes in patient functioning. The general approach to better clarifying the process of treatment has been to develop reporting checklists and guidelines that increase the amount of detail reported. However, without a framework instructing researchers in how to describe their treatment protocols in a manner useful to or even interpretable by others, requests for more detail will fail to improve our understanding of the therapeutic process. In this paper, we describe how the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) provides a theoretical framework that can improve research intervention reporting and enable testing and refinement of a protocol’s underlying treatment theories. The RTSS framework provides guidance for researchers to explicitly state their hypothesized active ingredients and targets of treatment; as well as how the individual ingredients in their doses directly affect the treatment targets. We explain how theory-based treatment specification has advantages over checklist approaches for intervention design, reporting, replication, and synthesis of evidence in rehabilitation research. A complex rehabilitation intervention is used as a concrete example of the differences between an RTSS-based specification and the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist. The RTSS’s potential to advance the rehabilitation field can be empirically tested through efforts to use the framework with existing and newly developed treatment protocols.

show abstract

Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study

Cited by 43 publications

References 80 publications

Identifying patterns of cognitive deficits: the path to better outcomes after stroke

Identifying patterns of cognitive deficits: the path to better outcomes after stroke

Update on the Clinical Approach to Spatial Neglect

The Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System: Implications for Improvements in Research Design, Reporting, Replication, and Synthesis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About