2017
DOI: 10.1159/000454885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal Hairline Recession: A Diagnostic Pitfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive response is manifested as stabilization, i.e., cessation of hairline regression, or improvement, i.e., hair regrowth; a negative response is considered as progressive hairline recession [4]. Some authors define disease stabilization as the absence of inflammation on biopsy; however, biopsy is an invasive procedure and is not routinely performed [46,47].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A positive response is manifested as stabilization, i.e., cessation of hairline regression, or improvement, i.e., hair regrowth; a negative response is considered as progressive hairline recession [4]. Some authors define disease stabilization as the absence of inflammation on biopsy; however, biopsy is an invasive procedure and is not routinely performed [46,47].…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies suggest that while TC use may result in stabilization in the early stages, discontinuation can be associated with relapse [17], and the treatment can also result in scalp skin atrophy, telangiectasia, erythema, or folliculitis [42,46]. In comparison, topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCIs) appear to have higher efficacy [47]. Patients receiving tacrolimus (0.3%) were more likely to achieve stabilization within 3 months compared to those treated with TCs [26].…”
Section: Anti-inflammatory Agents Corticosteroids/calcineurin Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations