1988
DOI: 10.1002/cne.902710403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frontal eye field efferents in the macaque monkey: II. Topography of terminal fields in midbrain and pons

Abstract: Frontal eye field (FEF) projections to the midbrain and pons were studied in nine macaque monkeys that were used to study FEF projections to the striatum and thalamus (Stanton et al.: J. Comp. Neurol. 271:473-492, '88). Injections of tritiated amino acids or WGA-HRP were made into FEF cortical locations where low-level microstimulation (less than or equal to 50 microA) elicited saccadic eye movements, and anterograde axonal labeling was mapped. The injections were made into the anterior bank of the arcuate sul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

20
172
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
20
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is therefore tempting to speculate that the output neurons of the dorsolateral PFC project predominately to the rostral SC. However, the fact that axons enter the colliculus via the rostral pole (Stanton et al, 1988) renders it impossible to determine the exact collicular site to which the DLPFC neurons we recorded projected. Thus, we feel that we cannot confidently distinguish whether DLPFC axons projected to fixation or saccade neurons and therefore suggest that both possibilities described above are equally likely based on our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore tempting to speculate that the output neurons of the dorsolateral PFC project predominately to the rostral SC. However, the fact that axons enter the colliculus via the rostral pole (Stanton et al, 1988) renders it impossible to determine the exact collicular site to which the DLPFC neurons we recorded projected. Thus, we feel that we cannot confidently distinguish whether DLPFC axons projected to fixation or saccade neurons and therefore suggest that both possibilities described above are equally likely based on our data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both cases, labeling was bilateral (Fig. 4D-H al., 1986; Stanton et al, 1988;Shook et al, 1990), and the primarily bilateral transneuronal labeling of the latter after unilateral rabies virus injections in the LR muscle (Grantyn et al, 2002).…”
Section: Arcuate Sulcusmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several of these nuclei are known to receive direct projections from the cortical areas containing labeled neurons. For example, the anterior bank of the AS projects to the MRF, SGI, NPH, Soc, NRTP, PPRF, NIC, and rip (Schnyder et al, 1985;Huerta et al, 1986;Stanton et al, 1988;Shook et al, 1990). Taking into consideration previous descriptions regarding the relative strength of these projections and the time course of labeling in cortical and subcortical structures in our experiments, the more likely sources of the labeling in the anterior bank of the AS are the Soc, PPRF, NRTP, and MRF at 3 d postinoculation (LR2) and the SGI at 3.5 d postinoculation (LR4).…”
Section: Sources Of Cortical Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of that experiment, a simple explanation is that the presaccadic activity in the FEF neuron increased to counterbalance the impairment of the corresponding spatial representation in SC. The increase in FEF activity could have a compensatory effect via its direct projections to oculomotor regions of the pons (Huerta et al 1986;Leichnetz et al 1984;Segraves and Goldberg 1987;Stanton et al 1988b).…”
Section: Sc Can Modulate Presaccadic Activity In Fefmentioning
confidence: 99%