2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Front-of-pack health imagery on both ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ foods leads people to misremember seeing health claims: Two memory experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vast majority of this research investigates the use of nutritional labels, and indeed several meta-analyses exist to catalogue this information (e.g., Campos et al, 2011; Ikonen et al, 2020). In more recent years, studies have investigated how other image types can influence consumer evaluations of product ‘healthiness’ and nudge purchase propensities for healthy alternatives (e.g., Delivett et al, 2020; Delivett et al, 2022; Gil-Pérez et al, 2020; Talati et al, 2017). Whilst this body of work provides important insight into the ability of images to communicate product information, it exists only within the narrow context of health and nutrition perceptions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vast majority of this research investigates the use of nutritional labels, and indeed several meta-analyses exist to catalogue this information (e.g., Campos et al, 2011; Ikonen et al, 2020). In more recent years, studies have investigated how other image types can influence consumer evaluations of product ‘healthiness’ and nudge purchase propensities for healthy alternatives (e.g., Delivett et al, 2020; Delivett et al, 2022; Gil-Pérez et al, 2020; Talati et al, 2017). Whilst this body of work provides important insight into the ability of images to communicate product information, it exists only within the narrow context of health and nutrition perceptions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All valid results must be confronted with other valid evidence that proves, in 2022, the superiority of other FoPL, such as the NutrInform Battery [162,163], Multiple Traffic Light [164][165][166][167][168], Warning Labels [169][170][171], the KeyHole Logo [5], Health Star Ratings [172] or suggest an improvement of the Nutri-Score [172]. All the aforementioned studies highlight higher performances of the cited FoPL, mainly in comparative studies, confirming the non-convergence of results when assessed through different relevant parameters in consumers' decision-making.…”
Section: What's Next With the Most Recent Contributions?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of new food nutrient enhancement technology that the public may be unacquainted with, studies suggest that the type, source, and framing of information provided to the consumers will always influence the public perception of functional foods [ 15 ]. Studies have shown that providing nutritional information is regarded as a very beneficial measure by government agencies around the globe [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. However, the nutritional information provided on back-of-pack nutrition facts panel and front-of-pack nutrition claims do not frequently assist consumers in making the best decision, since messages are not always easily understandable for most of the audience, especially in functional food [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%