2019
DOI: 10.1177/0891241619827633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Front Business–Back Business: The Social Anatomy of Small-Time Drug Dealing in a Mexico City Neighborhood

Abstract: Research introduced here draws on over two years of ongoing qualitative work of low-level drug dealers in a Mexico City neighborhood. Through interviews and participant observation, we explore the social mechanisms that sustain and facilitate informal drug dealing. Our findings indicate that the sale of illicit products, especially drugs, is a needed supplement to household income that expands and contracts according to economic need. Drug selling is integrated into the context of small licit (front) businesse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We learned that group connectedness was an added factor that influenced our subjects’ perception of the opportunities for membership. The notion that one’s path toward criminality is tied to significant others supports previous research (Chomczyński et al, 2019; Chomczyński and Guy, 2021) suggesting that intimate, personal, and face-to-face social relations characteristic of kin and friends were antecedents to participating in low-level drug dealing in Mexico City. Our interviews offered additional insight for understanding recruitment because they support the idea that a common pool of group experiences created an inclination to accept an offer to join a DTO.…”
Section: Beyond Money Power and Masculinity: The Ctsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We learned that group connectedness was an added factor that influenced our subjects’ perception of the opportunities for membership. The notion that one’s path toward criminality is tied to significant others supports previous research (Chomczyński et al, 2019; Chomczyński and Guy, 2021) suggesting that intimate, personal, and face-to-face social relations characteristic of kin and friends were antecedents to participating in low-level drug dealing in Mexico City. Our interviews offered additional insight for understanding recruitment because they support the idea that a common pool of group experiences created an inclination to accept an offer to join a DTO.…”
Section: Beyond Money Power and Masculinity: The Ctsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Gaining access to members of DTOs to interview presented unique challenges; especially in the local settings in which they operate, or correctional facilities. Chomczyński was fortunate enough to have conducted 9 months of ethnographic research on street level drug trafficking in the Mexico City neighborhoods of Tepito, Iztapalapa, and Tacubaya (Chomczyński et al, 2019). Known for their high crime rates, these communities provided an entry point to obtain referrals to interview members of DTOs.…”
Section: Data and Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venkatesh (1997Venkatesh ( , 2000Venkatesh ( , 2006, for example, explored the social relations surrounding drug dealing in a Chicago housing estate, while Bourgois (1995) highlighted how drug dealers were caught in a range of different relationships in a New York neighbourhood. More broadly, Chomczyński, Guy, and Cortina-Cortés (2019) have investigated the way that drug dealing is entangled with other informal economic activities in a commercial neighbourhood in Mexico City, while in his study of drug dealing in Brazil, Arias (2006) discussed the importance of patron-client networks and social orders. Finally, Das, Ellen, and Leonard (2008), as well as Goodfellow (2008), have explored how drug consumption brings prisons and the state deep into domestic life.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We memorized categories and invited respondents to develop and co-create interview scenarios by adding their own questions or editing ours. This gave us a richer description than a formal interview tool, and our interviewees became less suspicious [ 18 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. We believe that this method put our subjects on a more egalitarian footing [ 33 , 35 , 40 , 41 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%