2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient—Part III: Executive Summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
332
2
31

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 551 publications
(370 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
4
332
2
31
Order By: Relevance
“…5 The Society for Heart Attack Prevention and Eradication task force issued a stronger recommendation, suggesting that all asymptomatic men 45 to 75 years of age and women 55 to 75 years of age who do not have very-low-risk characteristics (ie, absence of any traditional cardiovascular risk factors) or a documented history of CVD undergo CACS or CIMT screening for the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis. 83 In an analysis from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, addition of CIMT and plaque detection via ultrasonography to traditional risk factors improved coronary heart disease risk prediction. 84 In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, CACS was a better predictor of CVD than was CIMT.…”
Section: Treatment Additional Cardiovascular Evaluation and Referralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The Society for Heart Attack Prevention and Eradication task force issued a stronger recommendation, suggesting that all asymptomatic men 45 to 75 years of age and women 55 to 75 years of age who do not have very-low-risk characteristics (ie, absence of any traditional cardiovascular risk factors) or a documented history of CVD undergo CACS or CIMT screening for the detection of subclinical atherosclerosis. 83 In an analysis from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study, addition of CIMT and plaque detection via ultrasonography to traditional risk factors improved coronary heart disease risk prediction. 84 In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis, CACS was a better predictor of CVD than was CIMT.…”
Section: Treatment Additional Cardiovascular Evaluation and Referralmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40][41][42] This may be helpful as surrogate endpoints for intervention studies, as well as potentially add to global CVD risk assessment and guide treatment decisions. [43][44][45][46][47] Subclinical atherosclerosis is commonly assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), coronary artery calcium score (CACS), coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). [5,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58] In recent years, some groups have started to evaluate these imaging techniques in former preeclampsia patients, as discussed below.…”
Section: Cardiovascular Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If using the 4.09% as borderline of significant change in the rate, the time of follow up can be shortened to 3 years in this study cohort. The guidelines of CAC scan recommended five-year interval of reassessment for those with a positive test result of atherosclerosis, and every 5-10 years for those with a negative test result [110]. Based on the result deduced from this study, it may be reasonable to suggest using the same time interval, and the same CACs image to monitor both osteoporosis and atherosclerosis in the general population.…”
Section: Follow-up Time Using the Qctmentioning
confidence: 79%