1994
DOI: 10.1177/053901894033002008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From theory to metatheory in social representations: the lines of argument of a theoretical-methodological debate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, corresponding to-and sometimes because of-the diffusion of the approach, discussions concerning the legitimacy of the notion of representation emerged under the impulse given by post-modern epistemological criticisms and the dominance of the linguistic and discursive turns. This situation has resulted in some important critical debates, reflected in articles and books, which gave rise to different orientations of research in the field of social representations (De Rosa, 1992). As we shall see later, these orientations have gained autonomy, prefiguring the present state of the field.…”
Section: Periods Of Diffusion Of Social Representations Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, corresponding to-and sometimes because of-the diffusion of the approach, discussions concerning the legitimacy of the notion of representation emerged under the impulse given by post-modern epistemological criticisms and the dominance of the linguistic and discursive turns. This situation has resulted in some important critical debates, reflected in articles and books, which gave rise to different orientations of research in the field of social representations (De Rosa, 1992). As we shall see later, these orientations have gained autonomy, prefiguring the present state of the field.…”
Section: Periods Of Diffusion Of Social Representations Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this sharp dichotomization between science and lay thinking has been one of the most criticized aspects of the theory. A number of authors have suggested that the ‘reified’/‘consensual’ universes distinction is over‐accentuated (Bangerter, 1995; Wells, 1987), downplays overlaps between common sense and scientific thought (De Rosa, 1994; McKinlay & Potter, 1987; Purkhardt, 1993), prevents the theory's application to the study of science (Farr, 1987) and suggests an overly generalized view of science (Räty & Snellman, 1992). In addition, the theory's original conceptualization of two distinct universes dominated by two forms of knowledge development fails to acknowledge the multiplicity of modern society in which knowledge and ideas bounce between various social spheres each with particular roles in the circulation of knowledge.…”
Section: Social Representations Theory and Non‐lay Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I am aware that the space opened up by the theory is far from homogeneous. There are examples of research being carried out under its umbrella that still draw on practices that compromise some of its basic assumptions (Allansdottir, Jovchelovitch & Stathopoulou, 1993;Wagner, 1994;de Rosa, 1994). Yet I contend that there is a sufficient body of theory and empirical evidence which combine to demonstrate the renewing character of social representations in social psychology, and my argument builds upon and seeks to develop this material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%