2008 IEEE Radar Conference 2008
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2008.4720935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the expected scientific applications to the functional specifications, products and performance of the SABRINA missions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3 shows the baseline variation with respect to the chief satellite Orbiting Reference Frame (ORF), whose origin is in the chief satellite center of mass, the y-axis is perpendicular to the orbital plane, and the z-axis is directed towards the Earth's center [1]. As introduced in section I, this orbital design has been proposed for next generation large baseline bistatic SAR missions in LEO [13], with the Italian COSMOSkyMed mission [24] taken as a reference for the orbit of the chief satellite carrying the monostatic sensor. The different ballistic coefficient for the deputy satellite is not due to the use of a different satellite platform for the deputy satellite, but to the different yaw steering maneuvers needed to point bistatic SAR antenna towards the area illuminated by the monostatic sensor [14].…”
Section: Filter Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 3 shows the baseline variation with respect to the chief satellite Orbiting Reference Frame (ORF), whose origin is in the chief satellite center of mass, the y-axis is perpendicular to the orbital plane, and the z-axis is directed towards the Earth's center [1]. As introduced in section I, this orbital design has been proposed for next generation large baseline bistatic SAR missions in LEO [13], with the Italian COSMOSkyMed mission [24] taken as a reference for the orbit of the chief satellite carrying the monostatic sensor. The different ballistic coefficient for the deputy satellite is not due to the use of a different satellite platform for the deputy satellite, but to the different yaw steering maneuvers needed to point bistatic SAR antenna towards the area illuminated by the monostatic sensor [14].…”
Section: Filter Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation is even worsened when separations are highly variable, with the satellites continuously coming closer and departing from each other because of the relative orbital path. This is the case of remote sensing applications in which parallel or pendulum orbits are considered to reflect next generation monostatic/bistatic spaceborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) mission needs in LEO [13], [14]. In these applications the baseline can range from a few kilometers to hundreds of kilometers during a single orbit [14]- [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With specific reference to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) missions, remote sensing applications based on using Synthetic Aperture Radars (SAR) are meaningful examples of formation flying. Cross-Track Interferometry (XTI) and Large-Baseline Bistatic (LBB) SAR applications rely on processing radar images of the same scene produced by two or more physically separated antennas [1]- [3], which shall be distributed on different spacecraft following specific relative orbital paths in order to realize the desired separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of the physical separation, i.e. the baseline, depends on the considered application, and can range from a few hundreds of meters in XTI applications [1], [2] to a few hundreds of kilometers in LBB SAR missions [3]. Depending on the application, the knowledge of the inter-satellite separation up to the millimeter level may be required also over very long baselines (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%