From the closest observers of patient care: a thematic analysis of online narrative reviews of hospitals

Abstract

Objective Patient-centred care has become a priority in many countries. It is unknown whether current tools capture aspects of care patients and their surrogates consider important. We investigated whether online narrative reviews from patients and surrogates reflect domains in the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) and we described additional potential domains. Design We used thematic analysis to assess online narrative reviews for reference to HCAHPS domains and salient non-HCAHPS domains and compared results by reviewer type (patient vs. surrogate). Setting We identified hospitals for review from the American Hospital Association database using a stratified random sampling approach. This approach ensured inclusion of reviews of a diverse set of hospitals. We searched online in February 2013 for narrative reviews from any source for each hospital. Participants We included up to two narrative reviews for each hospital. Exclusions: Outpatient or emergency department reviews, reviews from self-identified hospital employees, or reviews of <10 words. Results 50.0% (n=122) of reviews (N=244) were from patients and 38.1% (n=93) from friends or family members. Only 57.0% (n=139) of reviews mentioned any HCAHPS domain. Additional salient domains were: Financing, including unexpected out of pocket costs and difficult interactions with billing departments; system-centred care; and perceptions of safety. These domains were mentioned in 51.2% (n=125) of reviews. Friends and family members commented on perceptions of safety more frequently than patients. Conclusions A substantial proportion of consumer reviews do not mention HCAHPS domains. Surrogates appear to observe care differently than patients, particularly around safety.

Mapping outcomes in quality improvement and system design activities: the outcome identification loop and system impact model

“…In healthcare, this means patients, staff, managers and others. ‘Mapping out’ the system relies on asking participants the right questions in the right way , or, alternatively, asking these questions in the thematic analysis of transcript data, reviews and other sources of insight 18–20…”

We Want to Know: Eliciting Hospitalized Patients' Perspectives on Breakdowns in Care

“…Other work has also suggested that patients' friends and family members are an important source of information about safety concerns. 20,21 In addition, several patient characteristics were associated with an increased likelihood of reporting a breakdown, including being younger and better educated. These findings highlight the importance of engaging patients' friends and families in efforts to elicit patient concerns about healthcare, and they confirm recommendations for patients to bring a friend or family member to healthcare encounters.…”

Emerging Use of User-Generated Ratings to Supplement Healthcare Quality Reports

“…Social media websites such as Yelp and Facebook enable all patients to share their experiences, not just the limited sample that receives a survey. Family members and friendsnot just patients themselvescan also comment on these sites, potentially providing additional useful information (Bardach et al 2016). Social media websites also allow immediate reporting, thereby eliminating the considerable delays that occur with traditional survey methods.…”