2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2007.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From syntax to acoustic duration: A dynamical model of speech rhythm production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
43
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanistically, we currently favor an explanation in which speech-rate effects arise from the engagement of endogenous neural oscillators that are attuned to the temporal periodicities and quasi-periodicities present in speech (Barbosa 2007;Byrd and Saltzman 2003;Cummins and Port 1998;Large and Jones 1999;McAuley and Jones 2003;Nam et al 2006;Port 2003). Oscillatory activity in the brain occurs over a small range of frequencies (~1-40 Hz), which include the temporal frequencies of linguistic units (phonemes, syllables).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanistically, we currently favor an explanation in which speech-rate effects arise from the engagement of endogenous neural oscillators that are attuned to the temporal periodicities and quasi-periodicities present in speech (Barbosa 2007;Byrd and Saltzman 2003;Cummins and Port 1998;Large and Jones 1999;McAuley and Jones 2003;Nam et al 2006;Port 2003). Oscillatory activity in the brain occurs over a small range of frequencies (~1-40 Hz), which include the temporal frequencies of linguistic units (phonemes, syllables).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barbosa 2002). Coupled oscillator models of speech rhythm (Barbosa 2006(Barbosa , 2007O'Dell and Nieminen 2009) usually utilise at least two universal oscillators, the syllabic oscillator and the phrase stress oscillator, that operate at distinct timescales (cf. Cummins and Port 1998;Tilsen 2009).…”
Section: Prosodic Annotation and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A duração das vogais é considerada e não a das sílabas ou a das unidades V-V, o que constitui uma aproximação discutível do ritmo da fala (BARBOSA, 2007), mas as restrições inerentes ao corpus AMPER tornam impossível uma normalização estrita das influências intrínsecas dos fonemas; essas influências são controladas pela utilização das mesmas frases (e, portanto, dos mesmos fonemas), para todos os falantes. Sendo assim, neste trabalho observamos, com esta metodologia, padrões de alongamento e de redução da duração vocálica.…”
Section: Falantes Da Pesquisaunclassified