2022
DOI: 10.1364/ol.451903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From superradiance to subradiance: exploring the many-body Dicke ladder

Abstract: We report a time-resolved study of collective emission in dense ensembles of two-level atoms. We compare, on the same sample, the buildup of superradiance and subradiance from the ensemble when driven by a strong laser. This allows us to measure the dynamics of the population of superradiant and subradiant states as a function of time. In particular, we demonstrate the buildup in time of subradiant states through superradiant dynamics. This illustrates the dynamics of the man… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The underlying, socalled timed Dicke regime has been extensively studied, both theoretically and experimentally, e.g., with ensembles of laser-cooled atoms in the optical domain [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, the regime where the ensemble is highly excited or even fully inverted has only recently become accessible [15][16][17][18]. There, the theoretical description becomes increasingly complex due to the exponential scaling of the system's Hilbert space with the number of emitters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying, socalled timed Dicke regime has been extensively studied, both theoretically and experimentally, e.g., with ensembles of laser-cooled atoms in the optical domain [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, the regime where the ensemble is highly excited or even fully inverted has only recently become accessible [15][16][17][18]. There, the theoretical description becomes increasingly complex due to the exponential scaling of the system's Hilbert space with the number of emitters [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4c shows the result of decay time measurement as a function of pump power. As the pump power changes the fraction of ions excited, the lifetime linearly changes with the pump power below the saturation regime 51 . We discuss these results in more detail below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also in arrays, excitation of subradiant states can be harder than the superradiant ones 54,56,57 due to the complicated long-range interactions and many-body features of the atomic ensembles. Both inversion and pump-induced correlations between the atoms play a role in driving superradiant states 51 . At low pump powers, the interaction energy prevents efficient population of subradiant states.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It must be admitted that our scheme appears quite naive in comparison with some recent studies of incoherent pumping [18,19]. On the other hand, we aim for less.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%