2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.eml.2016.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From stretchable to reconfigurable inorganic electronics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 185 publications
(224 reference statements)
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These two designs show preferential deformation behavior, i.e., in‐plane and out‐of‐plane deformations, during the unwinding process. Critical factors that determine stretchability of the spiral bridges include the width, radius, and the turn number of the spiral arms, which can easily be tuned . The ratio of width to radius must be considered in the design, which is limited by the maximum principal strain ε max in the spiral arm: ε max = w /2 R , where w is the width of the spiral arm and R is the radius of the innermost circle .…”
Section: Structural Designs For Soft Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two designs show preferential deformation behavior, i.e., in‐plane and out‐of‐plane deformations, during the unwinding process. Critical factors that determine stretchability of the spiral bridges include the width, radius, and the turn number of the spiral arms, which can easily be tuned . The ratio of width to radius must be considered in the design, which is limited by the maximum principal strain ε max in the spiral arm: ε max = w /2 R , where w is the width of the spiral arm and R is the radius of the innermost circle .…”
Section: Structural Designs For Soft Electronicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Sensors with GF above 200 are often limited by a stretchability of 5%. 20,21 Other highly stretchable strain sensors based on CNT networks show a GF = 0.82 for stretchabilities from 0% up to 40% strain 22 and often suffer from nonlinearity and high hysteresis, 23 while a more recent study on monitoring fruit growth using ink-based stretchable strain sensors displayed a gauge factor of GF = 64, 13 but limited in terms of practicality and linearity up to only 8% strain. Therefore, a balance between sensitivity and desired stretchability needs to be attained depending on the application of interest.…”
Section: Performance Of the Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolution of state‐of‐the‐art complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) technologies, materials, and advances in the field of flexible electronics is driving the technologies of the future, where data, processes, sensors, and living and nonliving things interact in synergy for the Internet of Everything (IoE) applications . Recently, we demonstrated “Marine Skin”—a lightweight noninvasive physically flexible skin‐like multifunctional electronic tagging system with waterproof packaging .…”
Section: Comparison Of the Performance Matrices For Two Versions Of Mmentioning
confidence: 99%