2019
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201804385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive Featherlight Wearable Compliant “Marine Skin”: Standalone Multisensory System for Deep‐Sea Environmental Monitoring

Abstract: Advances in marine research to understand environmental change and its effect on marine ecosystems rely on gathering data on species physiology, their habitat, and their mobility patterns using heavy and invasive biologgers and sensory telemetric networks. In the past, a lightweight (6 g) compliant environmental monitoring system: Marine Skin was demonstrated. In this paper, an enhanced version of that skin with improved functionalities (500–1500% enhanced sensitivity), packaging, and most importantly its endu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several groups are globally aiming for standardized quality control, metadata, and data sharing of these products (Roquet et al, 2017). Additional sensors and improvements of animal-borne tags are continuously developed, such as active and passive acoustics or imaging (Thomson and Heithaus, 2014;Fregosi et al, 2016), and miniaturization as well as tag attachment (Shaikh et al, 2019). Already these efforts are becoming valuable for conservation policy and management decisions (Hays et al, 2019) and will prove particularly useful in deep-sea environments.…”
Section: Sensors and Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups are globally aiming for standardized quality control, metadata, and data sharing of these products (Roquet et al, 2017). Additional sensors and improvements of animal-borne tags are continuously developed, such as active and passive acoustics or imaging (Thomson and Heithaus, 2014;Fregosi et al, 2016), and miniaturization as well as tag attachment (Shaikh et al, 2019). Already these efforts are becoming valuable for conservation policy and management decisions (Hays et al, 2019) and will prove particularly useful in deep-sea environments.…”
Section: Sensors and Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This device is essentially acts as a standalone add-on. Such addon devices have shown to enhance the functionality of plants, marine animals, and everyday objects [67][68][69][70]. Further information about the electronic interface is available in Supplementary Text which can be found at http://bit.ly/2Ks4Weo.…”
Section: E Placement On Human Subject and Test Trialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the idea of volumetric reduction of the existing electronic devices using different techniques followed by flexible packaging and encapsulation for providing mechanical stability and reliability promises the pragmatic approach as has been discussed in this review article later. [10,65,[78][79][80] 3. Stretchability enables device deformability, which important in particular fields, such as biomedical, textile electronics, robots, and 3D displays.…”
Section: Direct Fabrication On the Flexible Substratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shaikh et al designed a flexible marine skin consisting of a wireless multi-sensory platform that is capable of measuring the temperature, depth, pressure, and salinity with unique features such as being waterproof, lightweight (<2.4g), cost-effective, adaptability to tag a diverse set of underwater animals non-invasively without any discomfort. [10,78] The compared with commercially available bulky products for marine environmental monitoring. [10] The performance of the marine skin is reported to be on par with the commercial devices.…”
Section: Packaging For Marine Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%