From strategic corporate social responsibility to value creation: an analysis of corporate website communication in the banking sector

Abstract

PurposeIncreased public scrutiny and stakeholder pressure have given more importance to strategic corporate social responsibility (SCSR) and its three dimensions – orientation, process and value creation. At the same time, they provide banks the inspiration needed to pursue business goals, attain positive performances and communicate their social responsibility efforts. This paper analyses whether and how companies in the banking sector use corporate websites to communicate SCSR dimensions.Design/methodology/approachA content analysis was performed based on the corporate websites of leading banks included in the Dow Jones Sustainability World Index and the Hang Seng Corporate Sustainability Index to assess the prominence of SCSR communication.FindingsThe study shows that banks give less prominence to SCSR on corporate websites differently from companies belonging to other sectors, as they are less likely to expose their orientation to SCSR and pay slightly less attention to value creation than other companies.Practical implicationsThe paper provides theoretical insights into SCSR dimensions and how they are communicated on corporate websites. From a practical standpoint, the study provides guidance for managers in the banking sector aimed at improving their communication efforts, avoiding decoupling issues and adopting a consistent value creation perspective.Originality/valueFew studies have used a value creation perspective to differentiate between the dimensions of a SCSR approach. The paper fills this gap by assessing the communication efforts adopted by banks and insurance companies in this area.

CSR, Co-Creation and Green Consumer Loyalty: Are Green Banking Initiatives Important? A Moderated Mediation Approach from an Emerging Economy

“…In different business sectors, including the banking sector, CSR is known to help companies achieve specific long term goals, rather than short-term goals [64,65]. This means that CSR not only aims to address the changing social problems of stakeholders, but also provides key business-related benefits for organizations [66], in particular through the creation of a common value [67]. The solution of these two goals, in fact, requires managers not only to know that their organizations pursue both economic and social goals, but also to strengthen their relationships with stakeholders, especially consumers.…”

Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility in the Italian wine sector through websites

“…Garde Sanchez et al , 2013; Rodriguez Bolìvar et al , 2013; Garde Sanchez et al , 2021); banks (e.g. Sobhani et al , 2012; Kiliç, 2016; Palazzo et al , 2020; Georgiadou and Nickerson, 2020); the hospitality industry (e.g. Hsieh, 2012; Iazzi et al , 2020) and agro-food (e.g.…”

The Mediating Role of Responsible Innovation in the Relationship between Stakeholder Pressure and Corporate Sustainability Performance in Times of Crisis: Evidence from Selected Regions in China

“…Moreover, enterprises focusing on growth and development integrate stakeholder pressure with enterprises’ value chain by implementing social responsibility activities related to their main business [ 44 ], that is, creating shared value through strategic corporate social responsibility [ 25 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. This multi-objective strategic model cannot only focus on and respond to the changing social and environmental concerns of stakeholders, but also provide opportunities and benefits for the core business of enterprises [ 48 ]. On the other hand, stakeholder pressure helps enterprises understand the preferences of stakeholders such as governments and consumers in terms of sustainability [ 49 ].…”