2013
DOI: 10.2217/pgs.13.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Single-SNP to Wide-Locus: Genome-Wide Association Studies Identifying Functionally Related Genes and Intragenic Regions in Small Sample Studies

Abstract: Background Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have had limited success when applied to complex diseases. Analyzing SNPs individually requires several large studies to integrate the often divergent results. In the presence of epistasis, multivariate approaches based on the linear model (including stepwise logistic regression) often have low sensitivity and generate an abundance of artifacts. Methods Recent advances in distributed and parallel processing spurred methodological advances in nonparametric sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With u -statistics for genetically structured wide-locus data comprising several neighboring SNPs (μGWAS) addressing the former two conditions, we have recently confirmed axonal guidance and Ca 2+ signaling as key pathways in childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) 20 from 185 cases and publicly available controls only. As shared genetic risk factors have been suggested for neurodevelopmental disorders, in general, 21 and epilepsies and ASD, in particular, 22, 23, 24 we hypothesized that these pathways are involved in ASD as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…With u -statistics for genetically structured wide-locus data comprising several neighboring SNPs (μGWAS) addressing the former two conditions, we have recently confirmed axonal guidance and Ca 2+ signaling as key pathways in childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) 20 from 185 cases and publicly available controls only. As shared genetic risk factors have been suggested for neurodevelopmental disorders, in general, 21 and epilepsies and ASD, in particular, 22, 23, 24 we hypothesized that these pathways are involved in ASD as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…• In epilepsy, (Wittkowski 2013) muGWAS confirmed the Ras pathway and known drug targets (ion channels, IL1B). In that analysis, muGWAS was also compared with a parametric analogue, logistic regression with interaction terms for neighboring SNPs (lrGWAS).…”
Section: Validationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this analysis, conventional single-SNP GWAS (ssGWAS) are complemented with a computational biostatistics approach (muGWAS, GWAS using muStat (Wittkowski 2012) ) that incorporates knowledge about genetics into the method (Wittkowski 2010, Sections 4.3.4 and 4.4.2;Wittkowski 2013) and knowledge about the nature of GWAS into the decision strategy. (Wittkowski 2014) Statistical methods tend to have higher power if they are based on more realistic assumptions, which, in biology, tend to be weak.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods used for human GWAS are particularly ill-suited to feature selection in RNA viruses, due to the short genome length, very high substitution rate and diversity, and the high degree of genetic linkage [48,49]. Human GWAS tend to concentrate on common variants to explain the observed phenotypes [15,49,50] by looking at individual SNPs, thus having severe limitations in the presence of epistasis [15,48,50,51]; our work demonstrates that non-parametric machine-learning based methods -such as RFA -are more appropriate in the context of RNA viruses, by identifying sets of substitutions associated with a particular phenotypic class, rather than solely evaluating the significance of individual polymorphisms [48,51]. The incorporation of interactions among predictor variables in RFA makes it possible to identify possible epistatic effects, as highlighted in Figure 3, with substitutions being determinant for host discrimination when found together with other substitutions at other sites, but being fairly unimportant by themselves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%