2014
DOI: 10.1038/tp.2013.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel computational biostatistics approach implies impaired dephosphorylation of growth factor receptors as associated with severity of autism

Abstract: The prevalence of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) has increased 20-fold over the past 50 years to >1% of US children. Although twin studies attest to a high degree of heritability, the genetic risk factors are still poorly understood. We analyzed data from two independent populations using u-statistics for genetically structured wide-locus data and added data from unrelated controls to explore epistasis. To account for systematic, but disease-unrelated differences in (non-randomized) genome-wide association s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 165 publications
(210 reference statements)
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highly selective regional expression of MET in developing limbic structures is consistent with its role in wiring circuits involved in higher cognitive, social, and emotional function. The role of MET in ASD is further supported by the findings that a large number of ASD risk genes are related to growth factor signaling (Wittkowski et al ., ), converge to regulate brain growth trajectories (Levitt and Campbell, ; Berg and Geschwind, ), and coalesce with other functional ASD gene networks involving cortical glutamatergic projection neurons (Voineagu et al ., ; Parikshak et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highly selective regional expression of MET in developing limbic structures is consistent with its role in wiring circuits involved in higher cognitive, social, and emotional function. The role of MET in ASD is further supported by the findings that a large number of ASD risk genes are related to growth factor signaling (Wittkowski et al ., ), converge to regulate brain growth trajectories (Levitt and Campbell, ; Berg and Geschwind, ), and coalesce with other functional ASD gene networks involving cortical glutamatergic projection neurons (Voineagu et al ., ; Parikshak et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This risk allele also correlates with atypical patterns of human brain activity in response to social stimuli, as fMRI measurement indicates reduced structural and functional connectivity in temporoparietal lobes (Rudie et al, 2012), areas express high levels of MET protein (Judson et al, 2011a). The human MET gene transcription is also regulated by FOXP2 and MeCP2 (Mukamel et al, 2011;Plummer et al, 2013), factor known to affect ASD-related circuits development in humans (Konopka et al, 2009;Wood et al, 2009). These findings suggest that MET signaling engages biological processes highly relevant to the ASD pathogenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Disruption of synapses and signal transmission that alters neuronal connectivity in the brain could in turn mediate functional changes associated with ASD (Auerbach, Osterweil & Bear, 2011; Hahamy, Behrmann, & Malach, 2015). Recent pathway network analyses, coupled with genome-wide association studies of autism, reveal the calcium signaling pathway to be the most affected, suggesting that it is highly involved in the molecular basis of ASD (Skafidas et al, 2014; Wen, Alshikho & Herbert, 2016; Wittkoski et al, 2014). Genes associated with calcium channels modulate neuronal function by mediating influx of calcium into neurons (and thus neurotransmitter release), intracellular signaling, and gene transcription.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this analysis, conventional single-SNP GWAS (ssGWAS) are complemented with a computational biostatistics approach (muGWAS, GWAS using muStat (Wittkowski 2012) ) that incorporates knowledge about genetics into the method (Wittkowski 2010, Sections 4.3.4 and 4.4.2;Wittkowski 2013) and knowledge about the nature of GWAS into the decision strategy. (Wittkowski 2014) Statistical methods tend to have higher power if they are based on more realistic assumptions, which, in biology, tend to be weak. In contrast, methods based on stronger assumptions, such as additivity of allelic effects and independence of SNPs within an linkage disequilibrium (LD) block (LDB), may generate more significant results when errors happen to fulfill these assumptions than for true effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we replace a fixed cut-off for GWS with an empirical (Aslibekyan 2013a) adaptive (study-specific) cut-off (aGWS) that automatically accounts for the specifics of the population studied, the chip used, differences in minor allele frequency (MAF,) and GWAS being non-randomized. (Wittkowski 2014) As previously discussed, (Wittkowski 2014) the expected distribution in a ssGWAS QR plot is a mixture of univariate distributions whose carriers vary by MAF, because the most significant result possible depends on MAF when outcomes are bounded (allele counts 0, 1, 2). Hence, it is a convex curve, rather than a straight line; (Wittkowski 2014) see, for instance, CGEM chromosomes 14-17, 19, and 22 (S1 Fig 2).…”
Section: Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 96%