2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2013.270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Semi-supervised to Transfer Counting of Crowds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is believed that given a fixed number of labelling budget, the most representative frames (in the sense of covering different crowd densities/counts) are the most useful ones to label. This brings in a chicken-and-egg problem [37], without labelling all frames, how does one know which ones are representative? Intuitively, the diversity between the selected frames should be as large as possible.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Elastic Netmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is believed that given a fixed number of labelling budget, the most representative frames (in the sense of covering different crowd densities/counts) are the most useful ones to label. This brings in a chicken-and-egg problem [37], without labelling all frames, how does one know which ones are representative? Intuitively, the diversity between the selected frames should be as large as possible.…”
Section: Semi-supervised Elastic Netmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluate the inductive inference performance [37] of SSEN which is the error rate on the "unlabelled data in the test partition". We examine the effect of labelled and unlabelled data by measuring the MSE performance across labelled set f10; 50; 100; 200; 400; 600g given unlabelled set f0; 200; 400; 800; 1000g on Peds1 and Peds2 datasets.…”
Section: Undersampled Srcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the learned regression model can be used to estimate the density map of any given image, and the corresponding object count is calculated as the integral of the density map. Different from other VOC methods [8], [5], [9], [10], [23], [11], [12], [2], [24], [13], [25], the DE-VOC methods yield object density maps that are useful for the analysis of object distributions across the whole image.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, [13] proposed a system that elegantly combines SSL and MTL with active learning and manifold learning to share information across camera views. The boundaries between different types of transfer learning are also loose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%