From Metropolis to Metropolis-based Region: The Case of Tel-Aviv

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract The decreasing importance of metropolitan areas in the distribution of population and economic activity within many nations of the developed world raises questions about the emergence of agglomeration diseconomies and the associated changes in spatial structure. Here we explore the thesis that a metropolis-based region (MBR), comprising the metropolis and a surrounding territory, has come to replace the metropolis as the appropriate unit of analysis. Using data covering the last 22 years for the Tel-Aviv MBR, various indicators are estimated. These include national and regional deconcentration (both measured in terms of population and employment), as well as centrality, dependence, attractiveness and integration (measured in terms of employment). The main results of the analysis include the following: the need to view metropolitan stagnation and deconcentration within the wider context of the MBR; employment deconcentration occurring at a slower rate than population deconcentration, leading to increasing levels of employment centrality within the MBR; the process of consolidation within the MBR and a strengthening of its economic role within the nation. Terms of use: Documents in

Venture Investments in Israel—a Regional Perspective

“…The more interesting phenomenon we can see in terms of LQ(EHT/ ET) is the fact that the heaviest relative concentration is actually in the district of the Centre, near Tel-Aviv but not in the district of Tel-Aviv itself: we find there the highest location quotient of 1.49, while in Tel-Aviv the quotient is quite close to 1, showing a frequency of high-tech employment which does not differ significantly from the frequency of total employment. This perfectly fits the concept of Metropolitan Based Region (MBR) as shown by Bar-El and Parr (2003), explaining the existence of a process of transition of economic activity from the core of Tel-Aviv to the nearby region. All other districts show a location quotient of less than 1-in the urban centres of Jerusalem and Haifa as well as in the peripheral Northern and Southern districts.…”

“…Knowledge-based economic activities, particularly high-tech firms, have a strong tendency to cluster, primarily around metropolitan locations and in the satellite urban ring around the main metropolitan area (see, for example, Bar-El & Parr, 2003;Capello, 2002;Cooke & Schwartz, 2003;Frenkel, 2001;Frenkel & Shefer, 2001;Schwartz, 2006). The main factors behind such a concentration include knowledge accumulation and knowledge spillovers, relational capital, tacit knowledge, external learning and processes of knowledge acquisition, and innovation networks, as described briefly in this section.…”

Regional Knowledge Economies: An Eu‐uk and Israel Perspective

“…The Central district has high-tech 'hotspots' in Rehovot, Ramla and Petah Tiqwa. In their analysis of the metropolitan development of Tel Aviv in Israel as a metropolitan-based region, Bar-El & Parr (2003a) show that the region around the metropolis enjoys more rapid demographic growth and, with a time lag of a few years, also more rapid growth of economic activity.…”

High-Tech Firms’ Location Considerations within the Metropolitan Regions and the Impact of Their Development Stages

“…Extensive empirical studies have looked into the determinants of an industrial firm's location (Davelaar & Nijkamp, 1989;van Dijk & Pellenbarg, 2000;Frenkel, 2001;Frenkel et al, 2001;Capello, 2002;Bar-El & Parr, 2003;Schwartz & Bar-El, 2007; Arauzo- Carod et al, 2010). However, changes in the importance of different considerations on the location choice of firms, in particular, advanced technology firms, in today's globalization era have rarely been examined by these studies.…”