Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-36731-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Mathematical Morphology to Morphological Terrain Features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the internal variability of topographic complexity of the reef, characterized by crevices, cracks and holes rather than whole blocks, it seems necessary to carry out further studies to calculate more accurately the true volume of the reef. Several tools are available such as mathematical morphology (Soille, 2007) or fractal geometry (Burrough, 1981;Curl, 1986;Taud and Parrot, 2005) but the application methods must still be developed. Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the internal variability of topographic complexity of the reef, characterized by crevices, cracks and holes rather than whole blocks, it seems necessary to carry out further studies to calculate more accurately the true volume of the reef. Several tools are available such as mathematical morphology (Soille, 2007) or fractal geometry (Burrough, 1981;Curl, 1986;Taud and Parrot, 2005) but the application methods must still be developed. Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digitization of cartographic material, compared to other methods, can be considered as a secondary data source, along with the processing of already existing digital relief data. Basically, on the digitized map, the contour lines (isohypse) are selected, and height values are added to their corresponding pixels [4]. Other sources, such as e.g.…”
Section: Data For Creation Of Model's Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topographic surface analysis methods can only obtain characteristic lines and are often case specific. Physical water model methods are often found to be unsuitable for applications in plain areas [23,24], particularly those with manual canal and ditch systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%