2014
DOI: 10.4204/eptcs.171.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Logical to Distributional Models

Abstract: The paper relates two variants of semantic models for natural language, logical functional models and compositional distributional vector space models, by transferring the logic and reasoning from the logical to the distributional models. The geometrical operations of quantum logic are reformulated as algebraic operations on vectors. A map from functional models to vector space models makes it possible to compare the meaning of sentences word by word.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the generating object I includes the semiring of positive rational numbers the 'counting property' of the predicates makes it possible to replace the canonical vector space model by a probabilistic vector space model where the basis vectors stand for arbitrarily chosen 'basic concepts', see [Preller, 2013]. A promising line of future investigations is the step from 'counting' predicates to measuring predicates in Hilbert spaces to capture the notion of 'truth in probability' and its relation to natural language.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the generating object I includes the semiring of positive rational numbers the 'counting property' of the predicates makes it possible to replace the canonical vector space model by a probabilistic vector space model where the basis vectors stand for arbitrarily chosen 'basic concepts', see [Preller, 2013]. A promising line of future investigations is the step from 'counting' predicates to measuring predicates in Hilbert spaces to capture the notion of 'truth in probability' and its relation to natural language.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suggested functor is partial, it is not defined for strings containing logical words, relative, determiners and so on. In fact, such a partial functor cannot be extended to the logical words expressing negation and implication, neither for classical logic nor for quantum logic, [Preller, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a free compact closed category as opposed to a free pregroup is a solution suggested in Preller (2013) to the fact that there is no corresponding strongly monoidal functor on a free pregroup that assigns to atomic types, spaces of more than one dimension in the relational and distributional instantiations. In what follows, we drop the source category B and denote the semantics by (C, W, S, [[ ]]) in cases where the source category is fixed.…”
Section: Abstract Compact Closed Semantics Definition 4 An Abstract mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details can be found in [7,16], amongst others. We note only that instead of using a pregroup as our grammar category, we use the free compact closed category J = C (B) generated over a set of types B, as described in [24,23].…”
Section: Background 21 Categorical Compositional Distributional Seman...mentioning
confidence: 99%