2005
DOI: 10.1093/ajcl/53.1.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Lerotholi to Lando: Some Examples of Comparative Law Methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Para Palmer (2005), o estudo comparado de direito é um campo difícil e desafiador que requer imersão em linguagem e no contexto sociocultural para afastar visões etnocêntricas e superficiais.…”
Section: Estudos Comparativos De Direitounclassified
“…Para Palmer (2005), o estudo comparado de direito é um campo difícil e desafiador que requer imersão em linguagem e no contexto sociocultural para afastar visões etnocêntricas e superficiais.…”
Section: Estudos Comparativos De Direitounclassified
“…When a functional approach is not appropriate, however, how are we to compare laws or legal systems that are substantially unlike or which seek to address different social problems; and how are we to describe the objects of comparison? Some scholars have advocated the study of ‘law in action’ (Palmer, 2005, p. 264; Reimann, 2002, p. 679); others the study of ‘legal culture’ (Cotterrell, 2006; Nelken, 2007, p. 29). It has been argued that comparative lawyers should study different ‘legal traditions’ (Glenn, 2000; 2006; Menski, 2006; Bussani and Mattei, 2012), ‘legal pluralism’ (Reimann, 2002; Cotterrell, 2006) and ‘globalisation’ (Twining, 2001; 2007), as well as transnational laws.…”
Section: Comparative Law and Socio-legal Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods of comparative law have developed over time and comparatists are always in search of something new (Chodosh, 1999). This is also justified by the fact that there are different categories of people who make use of comparative law: scholars or academic comparatists, legislative or reform comparatists and law-applying comparatists (Palmer, 2005). They can use different methodologies because there are different purposes that the comparison pursues.…”
Section: Globalization Legal Pluralism and Vertical Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have thereby acquired the status of separate methods: thus we have historical, functional, evolutionary, structural, thematic, empirical and statistical comparisons, and all of these can be carried out from a micro or macro point of view." Choosing a method is undoubtedly difficult (Palmer, 2005;Reimann, 2004). Annelise Riles brings out that a comparatist engages in comparison with the purpose "to find a model for modernization or to harmonize legal regimes" (Riles, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%