From Laggard to Leader: Explaining Offshore Wind Developments in the UK

Abstract

Copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. Without an account of technology politics it is hard to explain continuing policy support despite rising costs. By analysing the actor networks and narratives underpinning policy support for offshore wind, we explain how a fairly effective protective space was constructed through the enrolling of key political and economic interests. From%laggard%to%leader

The role of politics in sustainable transitions: The rise and decline of offshore wind in Norway

“…An important contribution in the literature on sustainable transitions has therefore been made by exploring how the creation of protective markets and technology-specific policies for new renewable energy technologies such as offshore wind (e.g. Kern et al, 2014) can counteract the effects of path-dependency and lock-in. With the attention to policies comes the need to understand how policies are shaped.…”

The political economy of carbon capture and storage: An analysis of two demonstration projects

“…new renewables as well as nuclear power) and therefore not all utilities see CCS as the way forward. One of the big areas of investment and resource potential has been offshore wind in which the UK is the world leader in terms of installed capacity (around 2.7 GW at the end of 2012) (Kern et al, 2014b).…”

Scripts in transition: Protective spaces of Indonesian biofuel villages

“…The three processes of shielding, nurturing and empowering may be initiated at the same time. Thus they do not have to sequentially follow each other, but may be coterminous and intertwined with each other (see also Verhees et al, 2013;Kern et al, 2014). Boon et al (2014) for instance, introduce the notions of niche creation, niche maintenance and niche phasing out to regroup activities referred in shielding, nurturing and empowering.…”

“…Shielding provides temporary relief for niche innovations against selection pressures from the incumbent regime; nurturing focuses on learning, articulating expectations and networking between actors; while empowering focuses on activities that make niche innovations competitive vis-a-vis existing dominant regimes. Verhees et al (2013), Kern et al (2014) and Smith et al (2014) use this framework to show how proponents of a particular technology (e.g. solar PV, offshore wind) try to shield, nurture and empower innovations in different contexts (e.g.…”