From junior to senior Pinocchio: A cross-sectional lifespan investigation of deception

Abstract

We present the first study to map deception across the entire lifespan. Specifically, we investigated age-related difference in lying proficiency and lying frequency. A large community sample (n = 1005) aged between 6 and 77 were surveyed on their lying frequency, and performed a reaction-time (RT) based deception task to assess their lying proficiency. Consistent with the inverted U-shaped pattern of age-related changes in inhibitory control that we observed in a stop signal task, we found that lying proficiency improved during childhood (in accuracy, not RTs), excelled in young adulthood (in accuracy and RTs), and worsened throughout adulthood (in accuracy and RTs). Likewise, lying frequency increased in childhood, peaked in adolescence, and decreased during adulthood. In sum, we observed important age-related difference in deception that generally fit with the U-shaped pattern of age-related changes observed in inhibitory control. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed from a cognitive view of deception.

Validation of a Bayesian Adaptive Estimation Technique in the Stop-Signal Task

“…The SST is problematic when testing younger children because of the large number of trials (on an uninteresting task) required to yield a stable estimate of SSRT. Although several comprehensive lifespan development studies have successfully measured response inhibition in children as young as six years [8, 9], gaining reliable measures of SSRT from younger children (especially children in the age range of 4–7 years) still remains a significant challenge for developmental researchers. Calculating SSRT requires manipulation of the SSD across stop trials.…”

Understanding Lies Based on Evolutionary Psychology: A Critical Review

“…Counterfactual thinking is focused on facts that have not happened, but could have happened and, like lies, the areas of the brain responsible for inhibitory control and working memory tend to be allocated (Briazu, Walsh, Deeprose, & Ganis, 2017). The mechanisms linked to lying and counterfactual thinking tend to be potentiated in a correlative way along with ontogenetic development (Debey, Schryver, Logan, Suchotzki, & Verschuere, 2015). This same relationship has also been made explicit in patients with impairment in frontal functions, including some degenerative diseases (Abe, 2009).…”

Neurologists win Ig Nobel prize for discovering that scratching the other side relieves itching

“…However, the study found that just over half the lies were told by prolific liars, who made up nearly 9% of the group studied. 4 The Peace prize was given to researchers from the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, and Yale University in the US for reception and detection of "pseudo-profound bullshit," which cognitive psychologist Gordon Pennycook of Yale described as sounding impressive but being meaningless or trite and with little concern for the truth. He told The BMJ that it was becoming more common because information and communication were increasing.…”