From honest mistakes to fake news – approaches to correcting the scientific literature

Stamm, Thomas

doi:10.1186/s13005-020-00220-8

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The fact that publications contaminated by errors coexist with their healthy counterparts in different databases, and in the worst-case scenario, multiply in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, is well recognized [13]. And this is just what has happened in the paper addressed within this comment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 78%

Comment on Costa et al. The Effectiveness of Different Concepts of Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2145

Weiss¹

2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 78%

Comment on Costa et al. The Effectiveness of Different Concepts of Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2145

Weiss¹

2022

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A rise in plagiarism detection can be attributed to widespread access to plagiarism software and the pressure for authors to publish. Plagiarised articles, when included in meta-analyses, are also an issue, as they artificially skew results and bias the pooled estimates (Brainard & You, 2018;Kharasch, 2021;Stamm, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Editorial - The Secret Life of Retractions in Scientific Publications

Parron Fernandes,

Dodurgali,

Rossetti

et al. 2023

ppcrj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This has resulted in a large body of open access knowledge being available today. However, the vast amount of data sometimes dilutes the true and effective information among the merely false and worthless [5,6]. Expert support is therefore essential if some form of scientific knowledge is to be applied to a given context, in order to reduce uncertainty.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Social Appropriation of Knowledge as a Key Factor for Local Development and Open Innovation: A Systematic Review

Rodríguez

Ramírez-Montoya

Díaz

et al. 2020

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The social appropriation of knowledge is an emerging descriptor in political agendas, since it drives social development and innovation. The relevance of this strategy lies mainly in the fact that scientific knowledge is made available to the population for its use and application. The purposes of this study were to identify the context and purpose presented by the experiences of social appropriation of knowledge, and to analyze the linkage of the experiences with the sectors that make up the pentahelix. To this end, a systematic review methodology was proposed in the Web of Science (WOS) and SCOPUS. Following the application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 14 articles were analyzed. The results showed the emergence of this term, the geographical location of all experiences in Latin America, and the diversity of application of knowledge to favor local development. At the same time, it is shown that the institutions belonging to the government have developed experiences of social appropriation of knowledge in all other sectors of the pentahelix. Finally, we discuss the findings and implications of this study that showed the diverse experiences of social appropriation of knowledge and investigated this concept in connection to open science.

show abstract

From honest mistakes to fake news – approaches to correcting the scientific literature

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Comment on Costa et al. The Effectiveness of Different Concepts of Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2145

Comment on Costa et al. The Effectiveness of Different Concepts of Bracing in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2145

Editorial - The Secret Life of Retractions in Scientific Publications

Social Appropriation of Knowledge as a Key Factor for Local Development and Open Innovation: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About