2020
DOI: 10.3390/joitmc6020044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Social Appropriation of Knowledge as a Key Factor for Local Development and Open Innovation: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The social appropriation of knowledge is an emerging descriptor in political agendas, since it drives social development and innovation. The relevance of this strategy lies mainly in the fact that scientific knowledge is made available to the population for its use and application. The purposes of this study were to identify the context and purpose presented by the experiences of social appropriation of knowledge, and to analyze the linkage of the experiences with the sectors that make up the pentahelix. To th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Este proceso de revisión se ha realizado en dos etapas: una primera de planificación y outra de acción (ROMERO-RODRÍGUEZ et al, 2020). Durante la etapa de planificación se definieron los objetivos y preguntas de investigación, se decidieron los criterios de inclusión y exclusión en función de la intención perseguida en este estudio, se eligieron los descriptores más apropiados y las bases de datos donde se realizarían las búsquedas.…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…Este proceso de revisión se ha realizado en dos etapas: una primera de planificación y outra de acción (ROMERO-RODRÍGUEZ et al, 2020). Durante la etapa de planificación se definieron los objetivos y preguntas de investigación, se decidieron los criterios de inclusión y exclusión en función de la intención perseguida en este estudio, se eligieron los descriptores más apropiados y las bases de datos donde se realizarían las búsquedas.…”
Section: Métodounclassified
“…However, the digital divide exists in the differences in access and use (consumption and production) of the digital and is deeply linked to the cultural, economic and social conditions of individuals, as well as their gender and age [79,[106][107][108], which hinders sustainable development [21,104] in a post-COVID-19 context [103,109]. For example, the "COVID-19 Infodemic" with fake news focusing on COVID-19 [35,36,110] created situations of misinformation that science communication found difficult to clarify [111][112][113][114][115][116][117].…”
Section: Digital Literacy and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pivotal role of digitalisation in emergency responses to the pandemic has pushed many cities to systematise the use of smart city tools more permanently, while staying alert and monitoring the risk of contagion [5]. The development of technology and open access to the Internet has favoured the accumulation of knowledge with the potential to transform the social environment [24].…”
Section: Collaborative Governance Multi-stakeholder Partnership and mentioning
confidence: 99%