“…Without it, one can explore the possibility that the working-class men were influenced by motives of both gender and class, which reinforced each other, but if accepted it becomes illogical to do so as the two motives are counterposed to each other. Critics of Hartmann's interpretation have argued that the interests and responses of male workers are less immutable and homogeneous than she assumes (Milkman, 1979: 106); that the family wage and exclusion of women were not necessary for the maintenance of patriarchal control (Mark-Lawson and Witz, 1988); that she exaggerates the role of male workers in excluding women from the labour force (Brenner and Ramas, 1984: 40-47;Savage, 1988) and that she underestimates the concerns which united men and women within the working class (Vogel, 1983: 171).…”