2000
DOI: 10.1080/10632920009599568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Communism to Civil Society? The Arts and the Nonprofit Sector in Central and Eastern Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the Soviet era, the art trade in Russia was officially forbidden. Since art in played an important role in the Soviet society as an ideological, educational and recreational tool, the distribution of it was controlled by state organizations (Lazarev 1979;Toepler 2000;Yankovskaya and Mitchell 2006). Artistic production was also censored by the government (cf.…”
Section: Market Development In Russia and Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the Soviet era, the art trade in Russia was officially forbidden. Since art in played an important role in the Soviet society as an ideological, educational and recreational tool, the distribution of it was controlled by state organizations (Lazarev 1979;Toepler 2000;Yankovskaya and Mitchell 2006). Artistic production was also censored by the government (cf.…”
Section: Market Development In Russia and Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies regarding the cultural sector in Eastern Europe underline how market pressures pave the way for increased commodification and commercialization of cultural products, marking a strong difference with the pre-1989 system, which was rich in supply, heavily state subsidized, and largely decommodified (Toepler 2000;Ilczuk and Wieczorek 2000;Murzyn-Kupisz 2008). While commercialization is a common aspect across our three case studies, we believe that its implications are more nuanced than usually observed.…”
Section: Concluding Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%