From citadels to clusters: the evolution of regional innovation policies in Australia

Abstract

In Australia, the federal (central) and State (regional) governments share constitutional responsibility for aspects of science and innovation policy. In practice, the federal government has tended to overshadow the States both in funding and policy for research and innovation. It can be argued that we are now seeing the strong rebirth of regionalism (at least at the State level) as far as government support for science, technology and knowledge‐based industries is concerned. The paper traces the growth of regional innovation policies through examples of initiatives from South Australia and other regions and examines the respective contributions of the State and federal governments. The character of State government support has evolved over the last 15 years, from sponsoring grand ‘technology citadels’ to today's strategies that take a more bottom‐up approach to building intense innovation environments, local clusters and knowledge hubs. Some of these trends reflect the influence of the global knowledge economy on regional industries, while others (notably the relative decline of the federal government as an R&D performer) are peculiarities of the Australian innovation system. The outcome is a significant evolution in Australia's innovation system, one which parallels responses to globalisation in other countries and suggests a different – but not diminished – role for public sector innovation policy.

Spatiotemporal Agglomeration of Real-Estate Industry in Guangzhou, China

“…On the one hand, the agglomeration results from profit maximization and thus increases the economic efficiency and competitiveness of the industry. Policies may benefit from foreign investment and economic reconstruction responding to the agglomeration dynamics [65,66]. On the other hand, policies might have played an influential role during the agglomeration process.…”

Organizational Innovations in the Public Science Sector: An International Comparison of Cooperative Research Programs

“…• A stronger attention toward regional policies and local contexts (Garrett-Jones, 2004;; • The need of solving political and management problems related with a multilevel system of governance, as we observed for the case of Spain (FernandezEsquinas and Ramos-Vielba, 2011); • The problem of durability and transformation of existing programs • The existence of institutional mechanisms of imitation and diffusion of cooperative research models across countries (Bozeman, 2013) …”

Universities in the Knowledge Economy: A Comparative Analysis of Nested Institutions

“…But beginning in the 1950s, the universities started receiving greater levels of support from the federal government until the federal government assumed full financial responsibility for the universities in 1974. State governments have played an on-going role in supporting the development of regional innovation systems (Garett-Jones 2004). For example, in 2002 the Government of Victoria announced an innovation strategy, which included establishment of the Innovation Economy Advisory Board.…”