2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From car sickness to autonomous car sickness: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the vehicle taking complete control of the driving process, the drivers’ role is expected to change completely, enabling them to work or entertain themselves throughout the journey. However, it has been shown that engaging in tasks such as reading [ 1 ] or performing visual search tasks [ 2 ] that deprive passengers of a clear view of the external moving environment, can lead to increased motion sickness (MS), introducing a new challenge for autonomous vehicles’ infotainment designs [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Iskander et al have written an extensive review on the new “autonomous car sickness” (i.e., motion sickness, perceived in autonomous vehicles) in comparison to classic “car sickness” [ 4 ], expressing the need to separately study MS in AVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the vehicle taking complete control of the driving process, the drivers’ role is expected to change completely, enabling them to work or entertain themselves throughout the journey. However, it has been shown that engaging in tasks such as reading [ 1 ] or performing visual search tasks [ 2 ] that deprive passengers of a clear view of the external moving environment, can lead to increased motion sickness (MS), introducing a new challenge for autonomous vehicles’ infotainment designs [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Iskander et al have written an extensive review on the new “autonomous car sickness” (i.e., motion sickness, perceived in autonomous vehicles) in comparison to classic “car sickness” [ 4 ], expressing the need to separately study MS in AVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has been shown that engaging in tasks such as reading [ 1 ] or performing visual search tasks [ 2 ] that deprive passengers of a clear view of the external moving environment, can lead to increased motion sickness (MS), introducing a new challenge for autonomous vehicles’ infotainment designs [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Iskander et al have written an extensive review on the new “autonomous car sickness” (i.e., motion sickness, perceived in autonomous vehicles) in comparison to classic “car sickness” [ 4 ], expressing the need to separately study MS in AVs. Since the occurrence and severity of MS in AVs are expected to increase [ 3 , 7 ], the general acceptance of AVs could be questionable without proper countermeasures [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Also, classical WFs suffer from other drawbacks including fixed WF parameters, absence of a human vestibular model and lack of consideration for MSP's limitations. These drawbacks lead to motion sickness as the most important drawback of the MCA [16]. The concept of the adaptive WF was introduced by Parrish et al [17] to change cut-off frequencies of the classical WF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%