1999
DOI: 10.3138/9781442602601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Bureaucracy to Public Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of rules and norms of governance, and the strategic engineering of the distribution of finite public resources, is of critical importance to understanding how public administration works. After all, governance in Canada is a complex intersection of ideas, structures, processes and cultures (Doern and Phidd, 1983; Dwivedi and Gow, 1999). Early conceptualizations of Canadian public policy found that it is underpinned by partisan politics and ideology (Manzer, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of rules and norms of governance, and the strategic engineering of the distribution of finite public resources, is of critical importance to understanding how public administration works. After all, governance in Canada is a complex intersection of ideas, structures, processes and cultures (Doern and Phidd, 1983; Dwivedi and Gow, 1999). Early conceptualizations of Canadian public policy found that it is underpinned by partisan politics and ideology (Manzer, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was driven by a belief that the “private is better than the public” (Kapucu 2007: 890–91). Its neoliberal approach promised that applying private‐sector practices and values would offer relief from the rigidities of large government bureaucracies and from the high taxes and deficits that had become associated with the “welfare state” (Clark 2002; Dwivedi and Gow 1999).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Privatization and “New Public Management”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key prescriptions of NPM included emphasizing results over procedures, delegating authority, reducing the total cost of the public sector, disaggregating administrative units, and decentralizing authority. NPM also claimed that efficiencies could be achieved through competition and contracting out (Dwivedi and Gow 1999; Hood 1991).…”
Section: The Challenge Of Privatization and “New Public Management”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature on public sector reform, Canada is often regarded as a laggard or an excep tion to the new public management trend (Aucoin, 2002). Commentators note that successive Canadian governments have failed to articulate a positive reform agenda for public administration; politicians have not been involved in reforming bureaucracies in the same high profile way as in Australia, New Zealand, the UK and US, although they have been attracted by the downsizing and privatization elements of the new public management (Aucoin, 2002;Bakvis, 2000;Dwivedi and Gow, 1999). Unlike the other AngloAmerican jurisdictions, which embraced substantial public sector Howard Are we being served?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the other AngloAmerican jurisdictions, which embraced substantial public sector Howard Are we being served? 67 68 International Review of Administrative Sciences 76(1) reform initiatives at the political level with positive visions of administrative transforma tion, Canada's notable reforms of the 1990s, both provincially and federally, were mostly negative exercises in reducing the size of government (Clark, 2002;Dwivedi and Gow, 1999;Taras and Tupper, 1994). Thus the Chrétien Government initiated a drastic budget cutting exercise called Program Review in 1995, against a backdrop of substantial budget deficits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%