2013
DOI: 10.1093/lawfam/ebt006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From 'Bidie-in' to 'Cohabitant' in Scotland: The Perils of Legislative Compromise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if Quebec’s minority location and the links often posited between an ostensibly distinctive culture and the civil tradition (and the French language) might predictably foment monolithic simplifications in the service of easier preservation (Samson and Langevin, 2015: 721–722), such factors ought not to apply in France. It is obvious that legislatures may recognize cohabitants differently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction (compare Sutherland, 2013; Tobin, 2013). Less obvious is the call, modelled by this article, to understand legislative inaction as a promising site for comparative inquiry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if Quebec’s minority location and the links often posited between an ostensibly distinctive culture and the civil tradition (and the French language) might predictably foment monolithic simplifications in the service of easier preservation (Samson and Langevin, 2015: 721–722), such factors ought not to apply in France. It is obvious that legislatures may recognize cohabitants differently from jurisdiction to jurisdiction (compare Sutherland, 2013; Tobin, 2013). Less obvious is the call, modelled by this article, to understand legislative inaction as a promising site for comparative inquiry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%