From a Pluralism of Grounds to Proto‐Legal Relations: Accounting for the Grounds of Obligations of Justice

Abstract

In this paper I discuss critically Mathias Risse's paper "Responsibility and Global Justice." First, I argue that for Risse's pluralist account of the grounds of justice to hold together, there is need to presuppose a monist standpoint which ultimately contributes to grounding principles of justice. Second, I point out that Risse's understanding of obligations of accountability and justification is rather narrow in that it functions as an addendum to obligations of justice. Conversely, I will suggest that the obligation of accountability plays a deeper role: The conditions that ground it feature at the same time among the grounds of obligations of justice. Accordingly, the kind of relation that gives rise to a duty among agents to account for their actions must be in place when obligations of justice obtain. Following on from these remarks I will adumbrate an alternative account of the relation which grounds (enforceable) obligations of justice.

Konsep Pengukuran Kinerja Berbasis Kesejahteraan Islam

“…Justru kesejahteraan yang berfokus pada golongan tertentu akan menyebabkan ketidakadilan di muka bumi ini dan memicu adanya ke senjangan sosial pada masyarakat (Everett & Friesen, 2010;Jacobs, 2011;Lamberton, 2015). Sementara itu, jika penyebaran kese jahteraan pada segala aspek realitas yang ada di dunia ini menjadi tujuan pada peng ukuran kinerja, maka keadilan dan distribu si akan dapat diraih (Pavlakos, 2017).…”