1982
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1982.32.1.43
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frictional heat and strength loss in some rapid landslides

Abstract: Frictional heat generated within fluid-saturated landslide slip zones can create an increase in pore fluid pressure. This rise in fluid pressure is enhanced by large values of friction coefficient, initial porosity and slide displacement, and by small values of slip zone thickness and compressibility. If maintained under conditions of fast slip, and small wall rock permeability and shear dilatancy, fluid pressure rise can induce rapid frictional strength loss during sliding. Moderate sliding can thereby be con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Curves (1) correspond to the case of a perfectly plastic soil (zero softening) show the same behaviour, and also make it clear that thermal pressurisation alone could lead to catastrophic accelerations (cf. Voight & Faust, 1982). Curves (3) correspond to the clay softening model, as discussed in our paper (weakly coupled displacement and velocity softening).…”
Section: Author's Replymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Curves (1) correspond to the case of a perfectly plastic soil (zero softening) show the same behaviour, and also make it clear that thermal pressurisation alone could lead to catastrophic accelerations (cf. Voight & Faust, 1982). Curves (3) correspond to the clay softening model, as discussed in our paper (weakly coupled displacement and velocity softening).…”
Section: Author's Replymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…According to the discussion by Sitar et al (2005) and Caloi (1966), part of the slide mass has moved more than 400 m in less than 60 s. Previously published papers indicate that the average maximum slide velocity can range from 20 to 50 m/s (Hendron and Patton 1987). Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the unusual high velocity, including the reduction of shear strength, weak layer beneath the slope, disintegration of the slide mass (Hendron and Patton 1987;Voight and Faust 1982;Sitar et al 2005). In this paper, we have investigated the slope velocity by the DEM simulations.…”
Section: Slope Velocity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 m/s) (Ciabatti 1964;Chen et al 2006;Crosta et al 2013) is still an important research subject. Many theories and assumptions have been proposed in the attempt to explain the apparent high mobility of rock and debris avalanches, and in particular, for the Vajont rockslide these theories include the thermo-poro-mechanical effects at the clay layer due to heating (Voight and Faust 1982;Vardoulakis 2002;Alonso and Pinyol 2010;Pinyol and Alonso 2010), high shearing rate-induced friction loss (Tika and Hutchinson 1999;Ferri et al 2011) and disintegration of the rockslide mass during the failure (Sitar et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature increase in the slipping zone may also have led to pressurization of pore water with the same effect [Anderson, 1980;Voight and Faust, 1982;Vardoulakis, 2000Vardoulakis, , 2002a. Total loss of strength by thermal pressurization has also been claimed for the Jiufengershan rock and soil avalanche triggered by the Chi-Chi (Taiwan) 1999 earthquake [Chang et al, 2005a[Chang et al, , 2005b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%