2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jestch.2018.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction stir welding of polypropylene sheet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thermoplastic-thermoset MMCs combine the damage tolerance characteristics, and welding capability of thermoplastics with the strength and stiffness of thermoset composites resulting in more reliable structures with an extended lifetime [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, joining thermoplastics to thermosets remains a challenging step despite the development of various joining technologies for composite structures including (i) mechanical fastening [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], (ii) welding [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ], (iii) adhesive bonding [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], (iv) co-curing (parts are cured at the same time) [ 17 , 18 ], and (v) hybrid joints (combination of two or more of previous methods) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Nevertheless, all these joining methods have disadvantages in terms of being unreliable, labour-intensive, time-consuming and expensive [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thermoplastic-thermoset MMCs combine the damage tolerance characteristics, and welding capability of thermoplastics with the strength and stiffness of thermoset composites resulting in more reliable structures with an extended lifetime [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. However, joining thermoplastics to thermosets remains a challenging step despite the development of various joining technologies for composite structures including (i) mechanical fastening [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], (ii) welding [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ], (iii) adhesive bonding [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], (iv) co-curing (parts are cured at the same time) [ 17 , 18 ], and (v) hybrid joints (combination of two or more of previous methods) [ 19 , 20 , 21 ]. Nevertheless, all these joining methods have disadvantages in terms of being unreliable, labour-intensive, time-consuming and expensive [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be the reason behind the better performance of a cylindrical pin in comparison to a conical pin. Sahu et al [118] have studied polypropylene sheets, and have shown that the square pin tool provides the maximum tensile strength compared to the cylindrical pin tool. This again might be because of its better mixing ability as the square edges are able to push more molten material than the plain cylindrical shape.…”
Section: Butt-joint Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that good quality butt joints were developed by FSW in HDPE. Sahu et al [16] used three different tool geometries with varying traverse and rotational speeds while applying FSW on PE sheets. They achieved a maximum of 59.82% weld strength by using square pin tool.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%