2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction force measurements relevant to de-inking by means of atomic force microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The friction coefficient is highest for the symmetric sphere-sphere case, which also has the highest surface roughness, and the friction coefficient is lowest for the microcrystalline cellulose surface, having the lowest surface roughness. Those friction values are consistent with previously reported data, Theander et al [11] report friction coefficients around 1 for two cellulose spheres, and Zauscher and Klingenberg [8] have seen a friction coefficient of 0.6 between a cellulose sphere and a flat cellulose surface.…”
Section: Frictionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The friction coefficient is highest for the symmetric sphere-sphere case, which also has the highest surface roughness, and the friction coefficient is lowest for the microcrystalline cellulose surface, having the lowest surface roughness. Those friction values are consistent with previously reported data, Theander et al [11] report friction coefficients around 1 for two cellulose spheres, and Zauscher and Klingenberg [8] have seen a friction coefficient of 0.6 between a cellulose sphere and a flat cellulose surface.…”
Section: Frictionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The sign of the potential cannot be directly obtained from the DLVO fitting, but zeta-potential measurements of cellulose show that cellulose is negatively charged above pH 3 [35]. At small surface separations a short-range repulsion was observed in all cases, which has also been observed previously for cellulose [6,7,11,13]. This repulsion has previously been interpreted as an electrosteric repulsion-due to the overlap of charged polymeric chains extending from the two surfaces; the range of the repulsion has been observed to vary with pH and salt concentration which was the rationale behind this assignment [6].…”
Section: Normal Surface Forcessupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Similar values of 1.00  0.05 and 0.84  0.08 were reported by Olszewska et al 29 for the friction coefficients between cellulose microspheres and CNF films in buffers of low ionic strength and pH 4.5 and 7.3, respectively. Friction coefficients between 0.9 and 1.3 were also obtained by Rutland et al 25,28,32 between two cellulose microspheres and between a cellulose microsphere and a solvent cast cellulose film in different aqueous solutions.…”
Section: Practical Implications Of the Lubricating Properties Of Ha-msupporting
confidence: 60%
“…2530 Friction forces between fibrils also play a very important role in the behavior of cellulose materials. Huang et al 31 have measured friction forces between two cellulose fibers, whereas Rutland et al 25,28,32 have studied the effect of different polymers or surfactants on the friction forces between two cellulose microspheres. It has been observed that the adsorption of carboxymethyl cellulose, modified by grafting short chains of polyethylene glycol (CMCg-PEG), remarkably improves the lubrication of both CNF films and reconstituted cellulose fiber networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-fiber friction plays an important role in flocculation and network strength of paper (Zauscher and Klingenberg 2001). Relevant work related to the measurement of friction in cellulose systems can be found in several references (Bogdanovic, Tiberg et al 2001;Zauscher and Klingenberg 2001;Theander, Pugh et al 2005;Stiernstedt, Brumer et al 2006;Stiernstedt, Nordgren et al 2006). Friction, lubrication and wear have long been of both technical and practical interest since the operation of many mechanical systems depends on these surface phenomena (Dowson 1998).…”
Section: Friction Phenomena In Cellulose Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%