2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-8348-2140-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frick/Knöll Baukonstruktionslehre 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The individual variants differ in the use of the ETICS or VF. A qualitative comparison with LCA-values [36] for different façade constructions shows that the ETICS have a higher global warming potential (ETICS: 70.7 to VF: 44.5kg CO 2 -eq./m 2 wall) and nearly a doubled primary energy content for non renewable resources. Reinforced concrete (e.g., as load-bearing wall) has more ecological impact than sand-lime bricks.…”
Section: Assumptions On Longevity Sustainability and Economic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The individual variants differ in the use of the ETICS or VF. A qualitative comparison with LCA-values [36] for different façade constructions shows that the ETICS have a higher global warming potential (ETICS: 70.7 to VF: 44.5kg CO 2 -eq./m 2 wall) and nearly a doubled primary energy content for non renewable resources. Reinforced concrete (e.g., as load-bearing wall) has more ecological impact than sand-lime bricks.…”
Section: Assumptions On Longevity Sustainability and Economic Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%