2006
DOI: 10.3133/sir20065106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Freshwater and saline loads of dissolved inorganic nitrogen to Hood Canal and Lynch Cove, western Washington

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once transported to the sediment, remineralized Cd is sequestered under reducing conditions as a sulfide mineral. This process has been documented in sediments of a Vancouver Island inlet (Pedersen et al 1989) and of the Laurentian Trough in the St. Lawrence Estuary (Gobeil et al 1987). These findings support the use of Cd as a tracer for reducing conditions in deep waters or at the sediment-water interface, which result from high productivity and/or low ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once transported to the sediment, remineralized Cd is sequestered under reducing conditions as a sulfide mineral. This process has been documented in sediments of a Vancouver Island inlet (Pedersen et al 1989) and of the Laurentian Trough in the St. Lawrence Estuary (Gobeil et al 1987). These findings support the use of Cd as a tracer for reducing conditions in deep waters or at the sediment-water interface, which result from high productivity and/or low ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Coastal upwelling provides an additional source of nutrients and fuels a high rate of primary productivity (*400 g carbon/m 2 /year (Antoine et al 1996)) indicating the coupling between ocean and estuary may be a more significant nutrient source than just watershed-derived nutrients and OM. Paulson et al (2006) estimated the oceanic load of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) to Hood Canal was *94% of the nitrogen (N) budget. Therefore, Puget Sound has generally been lightlimited (Collias and Lincoln 1977) and only periodically nutrient-limited during summer blooms (Mackas and Harrison 1997) and in nearshore regions (Thom et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of hypoxia in diverse regions, including the Chesapeake Bay, Gulf of Mexico, Hood Canal, and Long Island Sound, has been shown to be linked to physical and biological forcing, such as riverine nutrient input varying between wet and dry years [ Bianchi et al ., ; Hagy et al ., ; Paulson et al ., ], mixing and lateral advection due to winds [ Sanford et al ., ; Scully , ], stratification or overturning of the water column [ Bianchi et al ., ; Lee and Lwiza , ; Warner et al ., ], and reduced DO solubility with increasing water temperature [ Najjar et al ., ; Scully , ], all of which may be influenced by climate change. Using the yearly maximum hypoxic volume, the yearly cumulative hypoxic volume, and the yearly duration of hypoxia to characterize the severity of low DO has the additional benefit of incorporating changes in hypoxia caused by climate change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spring and summer, many Salish Sea subbasins regularly experience algae blooms, and rapid consumption of nutrients from the euphotic zone resulting in near eutrophic conditions (e.g., Bernhard & Peele, ; Harrison et al, ; Newton et al, , ; Newton & van Voorhis, ; Thom et al, ; Thom & Albright, ). Evidence of low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and hypoxia (DO concentrations <2 mg/L) has been documented in several basins (e.g., Albertson et al, , ; Barnes & Collias, ; Embrey & Inkpen, ; Harrison et al, ; Mohamedali et al, ; Newton et al, ; Paulson et al, ; Puget Sound Action Team, ; Roberts et al, ; Stockner et al, ). Khangaonkar et al () showed that eliminating all land‐based nutrient sources would result in notable water‐quality improvement, including a reduction in algal biomass (≈5.4%), reduction in sediment oxygen demand (≈17.1%), significant reduction in hypoxic area (≈39%), and reduction in exposure in area days to bottom‐layer hypoxia (≈62%) within the Salish Sea.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%