1991
DOI: 10.1049/el:19910635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency response and path loss measurements of indoor channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An analyze of Table I reveal similar values to that ones found in [3], [6], [7][8] analised in different bandwidths at corridors fact that provide no bandwidth dependency exist in path loss. …”
Section: Robusteness Of Uwb Signalsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…An analyze of Table I reveal similar values to that ones found in [3], [6], [7][8] analised in different bandwidths at corridors fact that provide no bandwidth dependency exist in path loss. …”
Section: Robusteness Of Uwb Signalsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A typical channel measurement technique used in indoor propagation is the frequency domain channel sounding [6], [7]. As shown in [6], this technique uses a vector network analyzer to control a synthesized frequency sweeper, and uses an S-parameter test set to monitor the frequency response of the channel. The frequency domain channel is then converted to the time domain channel impulse response using the inverse discrete Fourier transform.…”
Section: Venus Express Mock-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, measures the complex transfer function of the radio channel at 201 discrete frequency points between 900 and 1000 MHz over a time period of 100 ms. For noise reduction purposes ten such sweeps are averaged at each measurement location. A minimum three-term Blackman-Harris [3] window is applied to each measured transfer function and its inverse discrete Fourier transform is computed to obtain the equivalent impulse response for the radio channel. The 30 dB resolution of the impulse response functions obtained via processing of the network analyzer measurements is 25 ns.…”
Section: Descrifton Of the Channel Measurement Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reported techniques involves the use of a sliding correlator at the receiver [l] and results in a measured estimate of the channel impulse response. The other technique utilizes a network analyzer [2], [3] to measure the transfer function of the channel. Because each technique requires the use of expensive equipment and considerable development and calibration time, it is important to demonstrate that the results from the two techniques are equivalent so that researchers can use either, depending on the type of equipment most readily available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%